30/12/2015: POLAND – SEEMO REACTS AGAINST INCREASE OF POLITICAL INFLUENCE OVER MEDIA IN POLAND

30/12/2015: POLAND – SEEMO REACTS AGAINST INCREASE OF POLITICAL INFLUENCE OVER MEDIA IN POLAND

December 30, 2015 disabled comments

Vienna, 30/12/2015

The South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) expressed its disapproval of a new bill proposal in Poland regarding media freedom. On 29 December, the majority party introduced the bill rather suddenly, claiming that it was the first stage of a public media reform.

Under consideration for immediate adoption by the government, the bill proposal would transfer control over management and supervisory board member appointments at the public broadcaster from the National Broadcasting Council to the Minister of the Treasury.

If the bill is passed, it will be effective immediately and all current management would be dismissed.

“The proposed changes seem to be a powerful weapon for the government. Unfortunately, I have little faith that politicians want to increase the power and freedom of media. Usually bills like this are a blatant attempt to diminish freedom of speech and curb critical journalism. We call on authorities in Poland to revoke this proposal and focus more on other issues”, SEEMO Secretary General Oliver Vujovic said.

SEEMO is a network of editors, media executives and leading journalists in South East and Central Europe. SEEMO’s press freedom work is supported by the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) project, as part of a grant by the European Commission.

29/12/2015: SERBIA – SEEMO SUPPORTS SERBIAN JOURNALIST ZELJKO BODROZIC

December 29, 2015 disabled comments

Vienna, 29/12/2015

The South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) expressed concern over problems encountered by local journalist Zeljko Bodrozic on 28 December in Kikinda, Serbia, and calls for an official, independent investigation of the case.

Bodrozic, editor of local daily Kikindske and vice president of the Independent Association of Journalists of Serbia (NUNS), was taken into custody on 28 December in Kikinda. Police officers arrived at the Kikindske premisesand arrested Bodrozic for not paying a parking ticket worth approximately 75 EUR.
Bodrozic tried to explain to the officers that he could easily pay the fine, but they insisted on leading him to the police car in handcuffs. Bodrozic refused, leading to a quarrel between the journalist and his colleagues and the officers. He was eventually escorted to the police car and station without handcuffs.
After three hours, including an interrogation for “obstructing officials in performing their duty”, Bodrozic was released. He paid the ticket fine, which local officials insist was the sole basis for the journalist’s arrest. However, Bodrozic says that it may have been due to the fact that one of his arresting officers was previously the subject of an article in Kikindske.
SEEMO is a network of editors, media executives and leading journalists in South East Europe and an affiliate of the International Press Institute (IPI). SEEMO’s press freedom work is supported by the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) project, as part of a grant by the European Commission.

 

21/12/2015: SERBIA – SEEMO DISSATISFIED WITH TREATMENT OF MEDIA IN SERBIA

December 21, 2015 disabled comments

Vienna, 21/12/2015

The South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) condemns the growing number of cases in Serbia where journalists are being insulted, attacked, or pressured. SEEMO has also expressed concern regarding a recent physical attack involving a journalist in the town of Bela Crkva, Serbia.

Reporter Stefan Cvetkovic stated that he was attacked on Saturday, 19 December by unknown perpetrators who destroyed his car. The incident occurred after Cvetkovic was called a “foreign spy” and “legitimate target” by local government officials. His investigative work has been causing dissatisfaction among local politicians, including one who allegedly called Cvetkovic “a spy funded by the Soros Foundation”.

SEEMO calls any on members of the local political community who are exerting pressure on Cvetkovic to stop immediately.

SEEMO is a network of editors, media executives and leading journalists in South East and Central Europe. SEEMO’s press freedom work is supported by the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) project, as part of a grant by the European Commission.

 

21/12/2015: POLAND – SEEMO IS ASKING FOR FREE WORK FOR JOURNALISTS IN BOTH COUNTRIES

December 21, 2015 disabled comments

Vienna, 21/12/2015

The International Press Institute (IPI) and the South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) today condemned Russia’s expulsion of a Polish journalist in retribution for Poland’s decision to expel a Russian journalist for as-yet unexplained allegations of espionage.

Russian authorities on Friday summoned Waclaw Radziwinowicz, the Moscow correspondent for Polish daily newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza, to the foreign ministry, where he was informed that his press accreditation had been withdrawn and that he must leave the country within 30 days.
A Russian foreign ministry spokesperson told the Associated Press that the decision to expel Radziwinowicz was made “on the principle of reciprocity”, referring to Poland’s expulsion of Leonid Sviridov, a reporter with the Kremlin-funded Rossiya Segodnya news service.

Polish authorities last year labeled Sviridov a threat to the country’s security, but never released evidence supporting that claim. Sviridov, who denies having acted as a Russian agent, left Poland on Dec. 12.
“We are extremely disappointed by this development, which serves only to deprive the Polish public of independent information on Russian politics and government actions,” IPI Director of Advocacy and Communications Steven M. Ellis said. “Given the heightened tensions between Russia and Poland in recent years, both nations should take greater steps to ensure more understanding of their actions and policies by their neighbors, not less.

“We urge Russian authorities to reverse the decision to expel Mr. Radziwinowicz. Likewise, we call on Polish authorities to provide specific evidence justifying their decision to expel Mr. Sviridov and, failing that, to reverse that decision as well.”

Reports indicated that the order expelling Radziwinowicz from Russia cannot be appealed and that he was told he could face criminal charges if he fails to obey it.

Gazeta Wyborcza Deputy Editor-in-Chief Piotr Stasinski, a former member of IPI’s Executive Board, said that Radziwinowicz has served as the paper’s Moscow correspondent for more than 18 years and that Russian authorities threatened to withdraw Radziwinowicz’s accreditation several times during that period.
Stasinski said the paper considered that pressure to be a response to Radziwinowicz’s critical coverage of Russian politics and creeping authoritarianism under President Vladimir Putin, Russia’s annexation of Crimea and its support for armed separatists in eastern Ukraine.

“This [expulsion] amounts to an absurd pretext to get rid of a critical journalist who was explaining Russian affairs to the Polish public without even a shade of self-censorship or the Kremlin’s official propaganda,” Stasinski commented. “The understanding and deconstructing of Putin’s Russia was a trade and mission of Waclaw Radziwinowicz; a trade and mission that he was deprived of by a regime that fears the truth about itself.”

15/12/2015: NORTH MACEDONIA – BAD PRACTICES, BAD FAITH: SOFT CENSORSHIP IN MACEDONIA

December 15, 2015 disabled comments

Vienna, 15/12/2015

A new report released today by WAN-IFRA, the Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA), and the South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), details how the practice of soft censorship is undermining the media industry across Macedonia.

“Bad Practices, Bad Faith: Soft Censorship in Macedonia” outlines how financial incentives and partisan influence are increasing in the country. The ubiquity of such practices diminishes the credibility and independence of media and is curtailing the essential role the press has in fostering democratic development by reducing the space for public discussion and debate..

The new report is available to download below.

Extensive interviews 
with media experts, editors and journalists in the country reveal that pluralism and independent editorial perspectives represented in Macedonia’s media have drastically decreased. The report outlines how this decline coincided with the rise to power of the current ruling party in 2006, and has accelerated with its efforts to dominate the country’s media space through new laws and increasingly partisan use of state resources to support ‘friendly’ media outlets.

Official soft censorship, or indirect censorship, is defined as “an array of official actions intended to influence media output, short of legal or extra-legal bans, direct censorship of specific content, or physical attacks on media outlets or media practitioners.”

The financial realities of Macedonia’s small media market force many media outlets to depend
 on state funding to remain financially viable. Government-friendly media are bolstered by various means, particularly with the allocation of official funds, advertising, campaigns, and subsidised projects. This generates an environment in which partisan political and business interests set the media agenda and can directly shape reporting.

“As demonstrated through our previous investigations, research in Macedonia shows that harsher, more overt methods of media control are shifting towards subtler yet still very powerful tools associated with soft censorship practices,” said Andrew Heslop, WAN-IFRA Press Freedom director. “Independent media outlets struggle for survival through increasingly restricted advertising revenues, a daunting prospect for hopes of a sustainable future in a market the size of Macedonia.”

The report recommends action to reverse the erosion of media freedom in the country. All state funding for media outlets, including advertising, grants and other subsidies should be entirely transparent and allocated through fair processes supervised by independent bodies and institutions.

Equally, legal and institutional guarantees on freedom of expression compatible with EU standards must be fully implemented in law and respected in practice

Through detailed research into soft censorship practices globally, WAN-IFRA and CIMA are drawing attention to the kinds of widespread and deleterious problems facing independent media that rarely generate the same level of international outrage as direct attacks on the press. The findings and recommendations of the soft censorship research series aim to contribute to the implementation of fair and transparent rules that are necessary for the development of independent media sectors around the world.
A country report detailing soft censorship practices in Bulgaria will be published in January 2016.

WAN-IFRA also collects and regularly publishes updated information on the misuse of financial and administrative powers to manipulate reporting, which can be found – together with the soft censorship report series – online at www.softcensorship.org and on the Twitter feed @SoftCensorship. All materials are free to download and share.

The report:
http://www.wan-ifra.org/sites/default/files/field_article_file/Soft%20Censorship%20Macedonia%20Dec%2015.pdf

14/12/2015: GREECE – NEW CASES

December 14, 2015 disabled comments

Vienna, 14/12/2015

The International Press Institute (IPI) and the South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) today expressed solidarity with two foreign photojournalists physically assaulted on the Greek island of Lesbos while attempting to cover the ongoing refugee crisis.

According to local media reports, AFP photographer Aris Messinis and American freelancer Nicole Tung were ordered by a volunteer aid worker on Friday, Dec- 4 to stop photographing refugees on the beach near Eftalou. When Messinis and Tung protested, the volunteer instructed Greek lifeguards to “kick these people out”. Words were exchanged between Messinis and the lifeguards, one of whom eventually punched Messinis and with the help of colleagues threw him to the ground.

Tung told the Hellenic Photojournalists Association (EFE) that when she began to take pictures of the assault, the volunteer knocked her camera to the ground and pushed her down. She said she then saw one of the lifeguards place Messinis in a chokehold, which photographs published in Greek media corroborate. According to Tung, one of the lifeguards also threatened her and Messinis with a knife.

IPI recognises that some local commentators have apparently defended the actions of the volunteer and the lifeguards on the basis of claims that the photographers had invaded the refugees’ privacy. In her comments to EFE, which were later provided to IPI, Tung strongly denied such claims.

 

“A lot of insults were being heard, but Aris was also trying to explain that if a refugee, family, woman, man, etc. personally asking us to not take pictures, fine – we respect that”, she told EFE. “It is not up to the ‘authority’ of the lifeguards or other volunteers there to decide what to do with the press. Moreover, many of them have no concept of what the press is there for, and still more don’t understand that the reasons they’re even there is because they saw Aris’s pictures, and many other photographers images, in the first place.”

In a statement, the EFE expressed “deep concern about the emergence of self-claimed defenders of refugees, who consider they are entitled to control media coverage of the refugee crisis by imposing arbitrary restrictions on press freedom.” An EFE representative told IPI that the organisation felt compelled to speak out on behalf of Messinis and Tung although the two, as foreign correspondents, are not affiliated with EFE.

“Photojournalists have played an invaluable role in informing the Greek and European public debate about the refugee crisis, in many cases by visually capturing the depth and degree of human suffering involved,” IPI Director of Press Freedom Programmes Scott Griffen said. “Any attempt to prevent photojournalists from doing their jobs is therefore automatically a cause for concern.”

“In this case, there may be understandable tension between the press and those involved in humanitarian assistance. However, we unreservedly condemn the violence against Mr. Messinis and Ms. Tung, which should not be tolerated by the Greek authorities. Moreover, we remind that those involved in humanitarian assistance, however praiseworthy their efforts, are not entitled to decide the limits of press freedom.”

Separately, IPI noted with concern reported attempts by the Greek police to prevent media coverage of the removal of refugees from the border between Greece and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM). According to EFE, two journalists and two photojournalists who had arrived at the border town of Idomeni last Thursday morning to cover the operation were arrested and taken to a local police station ostensibly in order to verify their identities, a practice known in Greek as prosagoges.

In a statement, EFE called the police’s action a “flagrant violation of freedom of the press” and rejected the police’s argument that the removal of the journalists had been necessary for the latter’s safety. The organisation also decried what it termed the “manipulation of public opinion”, referring to photographs taken by police of the border operation and circulated in the place of media coverage.

10/12/2015: GREECE – SEEMO URGES GREEK AUTHORITIES TO END MEDIA FREEDOM RESTRICTIONS

December 10, 2015 disabled comments

Vienna, 10/12/2015

The South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) condemned recent behaviour of Greek institutions and police forces towards media workers.

On 9 December, riot police forces started removing migrants stranded on the border between Greece and the Republic of Macedonia / Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Traffic was blocked while migrants protested and occupied the border for not being allowed to cross into the Republic of Macedonia / Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, in an effort to travel to northern European countries.

Journalists who were live-tweeting and trying to report on the incident from the Idomeni camp near the border were removed from the area. Four journalists and photographers were arrested. They were then taken to a police station several kilometres away from the border, prohibited from using their cameras and instructed to delete the material they had recorded.

All the media workers were released soon after, but were not allowed to go back to the border and report.

“We urge the Greek authorities to allow free reporting on matters like the incident at the border, which are vital to the public interest”, SEEMO Secretary General Oliver Vujovic said today.

SEEMO is a network of editors, media executives and leading journalists in South East and Central Europe. SEEMO’s press freedom work is supported by the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) project, as part of a grant by the European Commission.

09/12/2015: HUNGARY – DISSAPPOINTMENT OVER THE DECISSION OF THE PARLIAMENT

December 9, 2015 disabled comments

Vienna, 09/12/2015

The International Press Institute (IPI) and the South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) today expressed disappointment over the decision of the Hungarian Parliament’s Justice Committee not to advance a bill that would have repealed criminal defamation and established safeguards against the abuse of civil defamation law.

Last month, IPI joined 29 other international press freedom and freedom of expression organisations in writing to the Committee’s chairman, Gyorgy Rubovsky, in support of the measure. The groups stated that the measure would promote “the right of Hungarian citizens to participate in public debate without fear of punishment”.

The Justice Committee on Nov. 30 declined to send the bill to the full Parliament for consideration, according to the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU), which had spearheaded the reform effort.
Dalma Dojcsák, head of the HCLU’s freedom of speech programme, told IPI that the bill aimed to counter the abuse of Hungary’s defamation laws by politicians. “It is a trend, especially in small towns all over Hungary, that public officials initiate legal proceedings after being publicly criticised,” she said.

According to IPI’s research on defamation laws in Europe, defamation and libel remain criminal offences in Hungary, punishable with imprisonment for up to two years under certain conditions. Defaming public officials does not itself carry more severe punishment. However, Hungarian law provides that while prosecutions for criminal defamation must generally be carried out privately by the victim, cases in which the victim is a public official are to be tried by a public prosecutor.

This imbalance, Dojcsák explained, facilitates the filing of defamation claims by public officials, with the state “taking over the burden of prosecution”. She noted: “The police will conduct the investigation, the prosecutor will make the accusation, and the complainant does not have to pay for all this. Indicted people will be fingerprinted and photographed, as if they had committed some serious crime.”

In proposing the repeal of criminal defamation and libel, the bill considered by the Committee would have rendered this advantage moot. However, the measure also sought to amend the Hungarian Civil Code by prohibiting public officials from initiating defamation claims for criticism related to their public or official activities.

“We’re disappointed that the Justice Committee of the Hungarian Parliament failed to act on an important proposal to protect the free flow of news and information in Hungary and to bring the country’s laws more closely in line with international standards on freedom of expression,” IPI Director of Press Freedom Programmes Scott Griffen said. “The abuse of defamation laws in Europe is being increasingly recognised as a threat to the public’s right to participate in open debate and the media’s ability to hold those in power accountable. We urge Hungarian lawmakers to reconsider this measure in the future.”

The HCLU recently launched a campaign called PolitiKuss (“shut up by politicians”), which highlights examples of cases in which Hungarian officials and government bodies have turned to civil and criminal defamation laws as a response to criticism.

IPI’s “Out of Balance” report last year revealed that the vast majority of EU member states retain criminal defamation laws, which represent a disproportionate interference with freedom of expression. However, recent years have seen clear steps toward legal reform, with the repeal of criminal defamation in Ireland, the United Kingdom, Romania and non-EU-members Norway, FYROM/Republic of Macedonia and Montenegro.

The abuse of civil defamation claims, including via vexatious litigation and exorbitant compensation claims, remains an equal cause for concern from a press freedom and freedom of expression standpoint. IPI and the South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) last month welcomed the Greek government’s proposal to overhaul the country’s current civil defamation law, known by journalists as the “press-killer”.

06/12/2015: HUNGARY – SEEMO EXPRESSES SUPPORT FOR HUNGARIAN JOURNALIST GERGELY NYILAS

December 6, 2015 disabled comments

Vienna, 06/12/2015

The South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) expressed its full support for Gergely Nyilas, a journalist working for the Hungarian news portal Index.

In August 2015, Nylias reported on the treatment of refugees arriving in Hungary. He registered as a refugee from Kyrgistan in order to better understand the situation and story. However, after he revealed this information, he was charged for lying to law enforcement officials and forging official documents. The charges were dropped due to public outcry, but prosecutors still issued a reprimand against the journalist.

Nyilas says that he acted in order to obtain information that was in the public interest. Hungarian authorities countered that Nyilas’ articles do not provide information of vital public interest.

SEEMO is a network of editors, media executives and leading journalists in South East and Central Europe. SEEMO’s press freedom work is supported by the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) project, as part of a grant by the European Commission.

 

06/12/2015: ROMANIA – SEEMO CALLS FOR PROTECTION OF ROMANIAN JOURNALISTS IN SURVEILLANCE CASE

December 6, 2015 disabled comments

Vienna, 06/12/2015

The South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) expressed its support for Romanian journalist Catalin Tolontan of the Gazeta Sporturilor newspaper.

Tolontan was allegedly followed by an unidentified man and woman, who were spotted surveying the journalist’s home by a neighbour on the night of November 24-25 in Bucharest, Romania.

Tolontan and his colleagues have published investigative stories about the tragic Colectiv club fire on 30 October, when 60 people died. The articles raised questions about the role that authorities might have played in the tragedy, alleging that the General Inspectorate for Emergency Situations (GIES) failed to ensure proper safety precautions in the public space.

Tolontan discovered that even though authorities first claimed the fire department had no information about the concert before it took place, a fax was sent to the authorities beforehand by the concert organizer. Authorities then confirmed receipt of the document and allegedly began an internal investigation.

“I urge the authorities to investigate what happened in front of the home of Catalin Tolontan on the night of November 24-25 and inform the public about the results of the investigation”, Oliver Vujovic, SEEMO Secretary General.

SEEMO is a network of editors, media executives and leading journalists in South East and Central Europe. SEEMO’s press freedom work is supported by the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) project, as part of a grant by the European Commission.