08/04/2011: UKRAINE – IPI WELCOMES PROGRESS IN INVESTIGATION INTO 2000 SLAYING OF UKRAINE JOURNALIST

Vienna, 08/04/2011

The International Press Institute (IPI) on 22 March welcomed news that Ukraine’s state prosecutor has opened a criminal case against former President Leonid Kuchma for his alleged involvement in organising the 2000 murder of opposition journalist Georgiy Gongadze.

Reuters reported that First Deputy Prosecutor General Renat Kuzmin announced the formal opening of a case against Kuchma at a press conference today. Kuzmin also said that restrictions had been imposed on the ex-president’s movements.

Gongadze, an outspoken journalist whose Pravda Ukrayiny Internet newspaper was highly critical of Kuchma during the former president’s two terms of office from 1994 to 2005, disappeared in Kiev in September 2000. His headless body was found six weeks later buried in a wooded area outside the central town of Tarashcha.

The journalist had reported being harassed and followed by the police for several months before his murder, and he had allegedly received death threats. A former presidential bodyguard released audio recordings following Gongadze’s disappearance which the bodyguard said contained Kuchma telling his chief of staff Volodymyr Lytvyn – currently Parliament chairman – and then-Interior Minister Yuri Kravchenko to “get rid of” Gongadze.

Kuchma and Lytvyn have denied involvement in the murder, and a technical analysis of the recordings commissioned by IPI and Washington-based rights group Freedom House at the request of the Temporary Investigative Commission of the Ukrainian parliament in 2000 could not conclusively establish the speakers’ identities.

Kravchenko was reportedly found dead in his apartment in 2005 with two gunshots to the head just hours before he was scheduled to be questioned in the case. Authorities ruled his death a suicide, and prosecutors in September 2010 formally identified him as the sole instigator of Gongadze’s murder.

IPI reported in 2000 that the investigation into Gongadze’s disappearance was marred by either incompetence or reticence on the part of the authorities, with one unlikely explanation after another being put forward.

Three former police officers were convicted of the murder in March 2008, but the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe the following year approved a resolution urging Ukraine to do more to prosecute former officials who may have been behind the killing.

IPI Director Alison Bethel McKenzie said: “We are glad to hear that the alleged perpetrator of this heinous crime, despite having occupied a high position, will be made to answer for the death of our colleague. The implication of prominent people in cases like this one serves to highlight the dangers of being a journalist.”

This press release is supported by the South and East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), an IPI affiliate.

Vienna, 08/04/2011

The International Press Institute (IPI) on 30 March denounced Belarusian authorities’ search of the apartment of Polish-Belarusian journalist Andrzej Poczobut, and their seizure of a computer and other items.

The search Tuesday morning followed news Monday that the state prosecutor in Grodno opened a criminal investigation against Poczobut, a correspondent with Polish daily newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza, for allegedly insulting Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko.

Poczobut said he was told that the Belarusian security service, which is still called the KGB, had pressed for the charge based on his reports for the newspaper, posts to his blog and posts to an opposition website named “Belarusian Partisan”. He said the KGB did not elaborate on what specifically offended the president.

If convicted, Poczobut faces up to two years in prison.

He described the search yesterday in a telephone conversation with representatives of Gazeta Wyborcza.

“Three KGB officers entered my flat in the morning,” he said. “They confiscated my computer. The KGB men showed me a warrant of ‘arrest’ regarding my belongings. They walked around my apartment, and selected a few valuables to confiscate, including my DVD player and my computer. Other items selected by them – like a refrigerator, and a TV set – were listed, and I was informed that I’m forbidden to sell or remove them from the apartment.”

Poczobut acknowledged that he was highly critical of and sarcastic about Lukashenko’s rule, but he said his writings could not be treated as an offence.

The journalist served 15 days in prison last month for allegedly participating in an unsanctioned protest rally on 19 December in Minsk following Lukashenko’s disputed re-election to a fourth term of office. Lukashenko received 80 percent of the vote in an election opponents and international monitors say was rigged.

Police arrested Poczobut while he covered the rally, but freed him the next day.

Prosecutors later charged him with participating in an illegal gathering and he was sentenced to pay a 600 Euro fine. The sentence was increased to include imprisonment after prosecutors appealed the verdict.

Poczobut is an activist with the Association of Poles in Belarus, an organization regularly persecuted by Belarusian authorities. Independent Belarus website charter97.org reported last week that Poczobut had been put on a list of persons restricted from leaving Belarus.

Piotr Stasinski, Gazeta Wyborcza deputy editor-in-chief and a member of IPI’s Executive Board, reported that Poczobut has been a frequent target of government-inspired harassment in Belarus, and that authorities repealed Poczobut’s press accreditation in 2009. Stasinski said the KGB stopped Poczobut in January in Grodno and questioned him for three hours during which they repeatedly hit and threatened him with an eight-year prison sentence if he appeared at another opposition rally.

Fellow Gazeta Wyborcza Deputy Editor-in-Chief Jaroslaw Kurski commented yesterday:

“A dictator fears his countrymen, fears what they think and say. He fears the word that he cannot control and censor. Andrzej Poczobut’s prosecution is yet another instance in which a journalist is repressed for bravely performing his job; for writing the truth the regime doesn’t approve of.”

IPI Press & Communications Manager Anthony Mills added: “No journalist, anywhere, should have to fear arrest and persecution because of their work. In any healthy democracy, journalists should have the right to be critical of the authorities.”

This press release is supported by the South and East Europe Media Organization (SEEMO), an IPI affiliate.

Vienna, 08/04/2011

The International Press Institute (IPI) obtained on 4 April a report from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) indicating that Turkey is currently holding at least 57 journalists in prison – apparently more than any other country.

The report followed an analysis of more than 70 journalists the OSCE conducted in conjunction with Erol Önderoglu, editor-in-chief of the BIANET Independent Communications Network in Istanbul.

While Iran and China topped lists last December by reportedly jailing some 34 journalists each, Turkey, a candidate for membership in the European Union, has nearly doubled that number five months later, raising questions about the country’s commitment to freedom of the press and the legitimacy of its democratic image.

The numbers in the report correspond with those given by the Freedom for Journalists Platform – an umbrella group representing local and national media organizations in Turkey, including IPI’s Turkish National Committee. One of the journalists jailed is IPI World Press Freedom Hero Nedim Sener, who reportedly stands accused of belonging to an armed terrorist organisation seeking to overthrow the government.

OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Dunja Mijatovic, who commissioned the study, called on Turkish authorities to bring the country’s media legislation in line with OSCE commitments on media freedom. She wrote in a letter to Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu that the survey was intended to show the need for media legislation reform, which she offered her office’s support in developing.

Estimating that there are between 700 and 1,000 ongoing proceedings that could result in imprisonment of journalists, Mijatovic said: “The sheer number of cases poses fundamental questions about the legal provisions governing journalism in Turkey, and it raises concerns that the number of journalists in prison can further increase.”

Mijatovic acknowledged that governments have a legitimate need to fight terrorism, but she said that national security should not be used as a ground to curb media freedom. She also commented that criminalization of speech should be restricted to clear instances of intentional incitement to terrorism or other forms of violence.

“It is very important that authorities protect objective reporting even on sensitive topics such as terrorism or national security,” she said. “The public’s right to know includes such issues.”

According to the report, another 10 journalists in Turkey are awaiting trial. An additional journalist, whose location is unknown, is subject to a search warrant, and two other journalists have been convicted but subsequently released.

The report found that most of the jailed journalists are imprisoned under articles of Turkey’s anti-terror law relating to criminal code provisions on terrorist offences and organizations, or assisting members of or making propaganda in connection with such organizations; or under criminal code prohibitions on establishing, commanding or becoming member of an armed organization with the aim of committing certain offences.

It also found that prosecutors have sought and courts have imposed extremely long sentences. Vedat Kurºun and Emine Demir of the Azadiya Welat newspaper were sentenced to 166 years and 138 years in prison, respectively, while Bayram Namaz and Ibrahim Cicek of the Atilim newspaper each face up to 3,000 years in prison. Mustafa Balbay of Cumhuriyet newspaper, Mehmet Haberal of Kanal B Television and Tuncay Özkan of Kanal Biz Television all face dual life sentences, plus further time.

Journalists also face several trials, the report noted, such as Halit Güdenoglu of Halit Yürüyüs magazine, who currently faces 150 court cases.

The OSCE said in a release accompanying the study that both laws and their implementation need to be reformed, insofar as court practices vary widely throughout the country. The group also noted that writing about sensitive issues, including issues of terrorism or anti-government activities, is often viewed as support for those activities, and that imprisoned journalists are often placed in high security prisons with the most dangerous criminals.

IPI Board Member Ferai Tinc, who is also chairperson of IPI’s Turkey National Committee, said: “These journalists are in jail because of Turkey’s anti terrorism law, which has become a law that threatens press freedom in Turkey. Every investigative journalist is threatened by this law. We find this unacceptable. We have asked the government to change this law, but, unfortunately, the government does not listen to the voices of professional journalism organizations.”

IPI Director Alison Bethel McKenzie added: “Turkey, at the crossroads between east and west, is a major regional power with an ancient cultural heritage. The country is also often held up as an example of a healthy Muslim democracy, and IPI held its high-profile annual World Congress in Istanbul in 2007 in recognition of the pivotal bridge-building role the country plays.”

“For Turkey to step away from this history and to jail more journalists than any other country in the world is damaging. We call on the Turkish government to respect the right of freedom of the press and to release all journalists detained because of their work.”

The OSCE noted in its report that in many cases it could not access full information, meaning details could not be stated with precision. The organisation also pointed out that in many cases classified as secret defence lawyers were not even given access to trial documents.

This press release is supported by the South and East Europe Media Organization (SEEMO), an IPI affiliate.

Vienna, 12/04/2011

The Vienna-based South and East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), an affiliate of the International Press Institute (IPI), condemns the recent bomb attack targeting Mutlu Esendemir, the news editor of the Turkish-Cypriot Kanal T Television and a reporter for the Turkish language daily Kibris. The explosive device placed underneath Esendemir´s car, parked in front of the Kanal T premises, exploded as he tried to open the car door. The journalist was treated in the hospital for minor injuries.

After the attack, that took place on 5 April 2011, Mutlu Esendemir wrote in Kibris that the attack against him was related to articles written during the past ten days regarding city planning problems in Keryneia.

Political parties and other organizations condemned the attack. Kemal Darbaz, president of the journalist association Basin Sen, said that attacks against journalists have become more frequent.

SEEMO is also concerned with the latest threats against Cenk Mutluyakah, editor of Turkish-Cypriot critical daily Yeniduzen.

As SEEMO reported on 2 March 2011, another Turkish-Cypriot journalist, Sener Levent, editor of the newspaper Afirka, received a death threat. On 25 February 2011, unknown attackers opened gun fire at Afrika’s office door. One bullet hit the wall and the other lodged in the door. The attackers left a note warning that next time the shots would target the journalist, rather than just his office door.

SEEMO Secretary General Oliver Vujovic called on the authorities to find the perpetrators of both attacks. “Press freedom has to be guaranteed in a democratic society and different opinions respected,” he said.

Vienna, 16/04/2011

The Vienna-based South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), an affiliate of the International Press Institute (IPI), expresses its concern about the deteriorating media environment in Serbia, including the government´s delay in formulating the promised Media Development Strategy; unreasonable court sentences; physical threats; and political, economic and legal pressure against journalists. Currently, three journalists live under 24-hour police protection.

The Independent Journalists´ Association of Serbia (NUNS), the Journalists´ Association of Serbia (UNS), the Independent Electronic Media Association (ANEM), the Independent Journalists´ Association of Vojvodina and the Local Press sent a joint letter to Serbia´s president, Boris Tadic. In the opening statement, the letter states: “This is not the reform that you have promised when coming to power. The situation is utterly alarming; however, the ruling coalition is procrastinating even with the adoption of the Media Development Strategy, despite the firm pledge, made more than a year ago, of its passing in agreement with us and the European Union…We know you are eagerly awaiting the decision from Brussels on the country’s candidacy for EU membership, but please note that at this moment Serbia is not offering any satisfactory answers to our questions, let alone European’s.”

The letter mentions several cases of grave concern. Belgrade-based daily Danas was recently fined 10 000 EUR for reproducing an article from another newspaper in 2006. The original story, published by the Belgrade dailies Kurir and Glas Javnosti, dealt with three policemen accused of beating their two colleagues and fabricating evidence. The policemen allegedly involved in the beatings sued all three newspapers. After five years of legal proceedings, the Appellation Court in Serbia ruled that Danas should pay the fine for all three newspapers as an act of solidarity.

SEEMO finds it inacceptable that one media is obliged to pay a fine for another. According to the media law expert, Slobodan Kamenjak, the court decision was not the result of an inadequate law, but of its wrong interpretation.

Furthermore, the pressure on media is particularly pronounced in small towns; local journalists are vulnerable to economic and political pressure. The economic crisis has exacerbated the already fragile economic basis of local media outlets, and municipal financing seems to be the last chance for their survival. In return, journalists are expected not to publish and/or broadcast critical stories. “Local press is on its deathbed, while financial situation of journalists is deplorable,” states the open letter and recalls that both in Belgrade and in the southern town of Loznica, three journalists live under the 24-hour police protection.

Two journalists from B92 Television- editor- in- chief Veran Matic and star investigative reporter Brankica Stankovic- are permanently protected. Stankovic has revealed several cases of high level corruption.

In Loznica, Vladimir Mitric, the local correspondent for Vecernje Novosti, was severely beaten by a policeman in 2005. He has been living with the round- the- clock police protection ever since. It took five years for the courts to sentence the perpetrator to a six month jail sentence. The mastermind has never been found. Although the court in Sabac has recently refused to pursue the investigation as to who ordered the beating, the police believe Mitric´s life is still under threat and keeps protecting him.

In Serbia, those who organize and order killings and assaults against journalists are usually not brought to justice. The masterminds behind the killings of Slavko Curuvija (1999) and Milan Pantic (2001) have not been found; nor has the death of Dada Vujasinovic (1994) been properly investigated. It was initially assumed that Vujasinovic had committed suicide. However, recent evidence appears to indicate that she was murdered.

The Serbian Journalists´ Association has recently published a long list of public promises related to the cases of murdered journalists. Starting 2001, politicians, ministers, public prosecutors and even President Boris Tadic have promised imminent detentions.

Supporting the demands stated in the public letter, Oliver Vujovic, SEEMO Secretary General, said:

“I urge Serbia´s authorities to comply with all their promises, i.e., draw a new and transparent media strategy, create a legal framework for transparent press ownership, respect media freedom and above all, bring to justice those responsible for killing, beating and threatening journalists. A free media is the basis of a democratic society.”

Vienna, 18/04/2011

The Vienna-based South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), an affiliate of the International Press Institute (IPI), expressed concern that the latest amendments adopted by the Bulgarian parliament could affect press freedom.

On 13 April 2011, the parliament adopted changes to the Penal Code and introduced possible incarceration, from one to four years, for journalists and writers who instigate hatred, discrimination or violence. While the previous law covered only racial discrimination, the current one specifies additional forms of discrimination, based on ethnicity, race, nationality, religion, sexual orientation, marital and social status, and disability. The amendments encompass all media: print, broadcast and online. Bulgarian laws do not define the concept of discrimination.

Ognian Zlatev, Director of the Sofia-based Media Development Center, told SEEMO that the amendments related to discrimination, could mean an attempt to impose controls on media and internet. He believes the hasty adoption of these amendments, without prior public discussion, might be a result of the forthcoming elections. He considers the new amendments a violation on media freedom.

Ivan Dikov, editor-in-chief of the Bulgarian English-language daily Novinite was surprised by the prompt amendment adoption. He thinks that they can do more harm than good. Dikov admits that discriminatory and hate speech are present in the Bulgarian media, especially in the online fora, but he does not think that the amendments would change the situation. “They might act as a backlash,” he told SEEMO, and be perceived as imposed by western NGOs. How the new prevision will be interpreted by the courts is of vital importance.

SEEMO condemns hate speech and discrimination. However, the organisation is also concerned with the prospect of journalists being jailed and how the courts might interpret possible allegations of discrimination. Experience shows that court rulings in this area could be abused. As a result, journalists could introduce self-censorship. SEEMO advocates journalists to apply self-regulation as a tool to control and prevent discriminatory rhetoric.

In a separate development related to press freedom, the parliament adopted a set of amendments related to the freedom of access to Bulgaria’s Business (Trade) Registry. Prior to these amendments, access to both the Registry’s data bases – the one containing the company’s profile and the second containing information on contracts, protocols and shareholder’s decisions – was unrestricted to all citizens.

As of 2012, the second data base will be available upon a written request by owners of an e-signature. The logs will be monitored. Full access will be provided only to the Court, investigators, personal data operators, lawyers, public notaries, law enforcement officers, legal advisors, and tax agents. As SEEMO stated in its letter of 1 March 2011, unrestricted public access to databases containing company activities have been an essential journalistic tool in uncovering corruption and irregularities. Under the new provisions, journalists will have no free access to a very important source of information, previously used to uncover corruption and irregularities in companies.

SEEMO Secretary General, Oliver Vujovic, said: “I call on the Bulgarian authorities to do their utmost to respect press freedom, and hope that the new amendments will not be used to promote censorship or prevent journalists from writing about the issues which are in the public interest.”

Vienna, 19/04/2011

The Vienna-based South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), an affiliate of the International Press Institute (IPI,) on Tuesday condemned the physical attack on Csaba Szögi, a journalist with Képes Ifjúsá, the youth supplement of the Hungarian-language daily Magyar Szó, based in Novi Sad, Serbia.

Szögi was beaten on 15 April 2011 by several individuals who waited for him in front of public rest rooms in Beèej (Óbecsén), a town in Serbia´s multiethnic Vojvodina province. Although bruised, Szögi did not require hospitalisation. The reporter was covering a youth art competition event.

Szögi believes that the attack might have been planned in advance. While hitting him, the attackers repeated the same insults used by the Hungarian nationalist and extreme right-wing internet portal, www.magyarazat.info, where Szógi´s photo is featured. The portal claims the journalist shames Hungarian culture.

Vienna, 20/04/2011

The Vienna-based South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), an affiliate of the International Press Institute (IPI), condemns the decision of Bulgarian authorities to deny Skopje-based journalists the permission to enter Bulgaria, without an explanation, and cover an event organised in the village of Melnik, where local hero Yane Sandanski was killed in 1872. Sandanski led a resistance movement against the Ottoman Empire. Ethnic Bulgarians and Macedonians disagree over his ethnic origin. Each group claims him as their own hero.

Three media outlets from Skopje – television channels, TV Sonce and Kanal 5, as well as the daily Dnevnik – were prevented from entering Bulgaria on 17 April 2011. They intended to cover the commemoration in Melnik. No explanations were provided. Border police stopped the car with Dnevnik crew and asked about their destination. Once they explained the purpose of the trip, according to a story published on the Dnevnik website, they were asked to turn in their passports. In order to have them returned, they had to sign a document stating that they lacked the proper permission to cover the event. Citizens from the Republic of Macedonia/Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia do not need visas to enter Bulgaria.

TV Sonce had a similar experience in 2010. As reported by SEEMO on 5 May 2010, the broadcaster was turned back at the Bulgarian border due to a lack of proper accreditation. In 2011, they applied ahead of time. On 4 April 2011, the Bulgarian embassy in Skopje sent an official reply: the application was denied. No reasons were stated. SEEMO contacted officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Sofia and Bulgarian diplomatic representatives in Skopje. While diplomatic representatives explained that all media permissions are decided on in Sofia, the director of the Directorate for Information in Sofia said that Bulgaria is a sovereign country and does not have to provide any reasons for denying accreditations.

According to Bulgaria´s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, all journalists need permission to film in the country. There are several types of permission. The decision on who gets permission is made in Sofia, while applications are submitted to Bulgarian embassies.

The experience of Kanal 5 was different. After applying for accreditation and providing all the required information, including serial numbers for camera equipment and a car engine identification number, embassy representative in Skopje said that there was not enough time to process the application, the broadcaster reported on its website.

The Association of European Journalists-Bulgaria sent an open letter to Bulgarian authorities, asking if journalists from the mainstream European media would be given the same treatment or if there was a deliberate targeting of Skopje-based reporters. When journalists are denied accreditation, they should receive an explanation. Blank rejections are contrary to international standards and clearly violate press freedom.

SEEMO condemns these discriminatory practices and urges Bulgaria´s authorities to let the journalists from Republic of Macedonia/Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia enter the country and report freely. SEEMO Secretary General Oliver Vujovic called on Bulgarian authorities “to adhere to international standards of press freedom.”

Vienna, 03/05/2011

The Vienna-based South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), an affiliate of the International Press Institute (IPI), on Wednesday expressed concern over excessive fines imposed on two Turkish-language minority publications in Greece, Gundem and Millet, which could result in the closure of the papers and even imprisonment for their journalists if they cannot afford to pay the stipulated fines: 150 000EUR for Gundem and 120 000EUR for Millet. On 6 May 2011, the Court of Appeal in Komotini, Western Thrace, is expected to revise both court sentences.

Gundem and Millet are minority publications with three journalists each and a circulation of about one thousand copies. Their readership is the Turkish-speaking minority concentrated in Western Thrace, northeastern Greece, bordering Bulgaria and Turkey.

In January 2011, both weeklies published a story about a local teacher who had volunteered to come from the capital, Athens, and work in the village of Mega Derio (Buyuk Derbent), and who allegedly asked her primary school pupils to draw a picture of God. Many of the children are Muslims, and since Islam prohibits the depiction of God they refused to comply with the teacher’s request, and complained to their parents. Both newspapers reported on the incident and were subsequently sued by the teacher.

The incident gained nationwide publicity because of the excessive fines. Analysing Greek media laws, the Athens-based daily Eleftherotypia newspaper recalled that the court had based its ruling on the fact that the story´s impact went beyond the local community since it was taken up by the Greek national media.

Eleftherotypia noted that the law stipulates that for a national publication the minimum fine is 29,325 EUR while for a local one it is 5,865 EUR. In other words, the fines of 150 000EUR and 120 000 EUR go far beyond the stipulated legal amounts. They could result in up to ten months imprisonment for the journalists if they are unable to pay. In a related development, while waiting for the Court of Appeal session, the teacher´s lawyer asked for a partial advance payment of the fine: 32,600 EUR from Gundem and 22,300EUR from Millet. Since the papers did not pay, in April 2011 the personal bank accounts of four journalists were blocked.

SEEMO is concerned that excessive fines could silence the minority press in Greece.

“As a European Union country, Greece is expected to uphold the highest standards of minority rights and respect cultural diversity,” declared Oliver Vujovic, SEEMO Secretary General.

Vienna, 11/05/2011

The Vienna-based South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), an affiliate of the International Press Institute (IPI), is disappointed with a Serbian court’s decision to sentence to only ten months house arrest a person who beat up B92 TV cameraman Bosko Brankovic, breaking his leg, injuring his shoulder and destroying his camera. The light sentence has fuelled a widespread sense among journalists’ and other media associations that the law does not protect journalists.

The incident took place in 2008 as Brankovic was filming protests in Belgrade triggered by the detention of Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic and his extradition to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague. Three protesters struck Brankovic while screaming: “Beat up the journalist”. Brankovic filmed the entire scene, until the aggressors broke his camera.

A court in Belgrade took three years to prosecute the perpetrators and pass the sentence: ten months house arrest for one of the men, and suspended sentences for his two accomplices.

The reaction of journalists´ associations was immediate: The Serbian Journalists Association suggested that the court sentence would not deter future attacks against journalists and noted purportedly attenuating conditions considered by the judges. A psychiatrist who testified during the trial declared that all of the attackers grew up in happy homes and turned violent only because they were part of a crowd.

In an open letter – in which he wrote that he was “ashamed as a citizen” – B92 editor- in -chief Veran Matic, who lives under 24-hour police protection, noted that according to Serbia’s 2009 Criminal Code the penalty for beating up a journalist is lower than for threatening one.
If a journalist is threatened but the threat does not materialise, the perpetrator can be sentenced from one to eight years in prison. If, however, a journalist is beaten and injured, but not killed, the Code foresees a prison sentence of six months to five years.

“In our penal legislation there is no balance whatsoever between the threat to society caused by a criminal act and the legally prescribed penalty. Judges are not to blame for this state of affairs, but the legislators,” Matic wrote.

He demanded that the legislation be changed and called for the training of judges who he said appeared to be unfamiliar with new provisions in the Serbian legal system, such as attenuating circumstances or pleading guilty in exchange for a lower court sentence.

“The ten-month house arrest sentence will not deter future aggression against journalists,” said SEEMO Secretary General Oliver Vujovic. “SEEMO supports the B92 demands for changes in legislation, an end to impunity, and the protection of journalists. So far, the police have been efficient in finding those who assault journalists, but slow court proceedings and disproportionately light sentences raise questions about the state’s commitment to protecting media representatives.”