European Media Freedom Act – Joint Statement by Press Freedom Organisations

European Media Freedom Act – Joint Statement by Press Freedom Organisations

September 18, 2022 • • disabled comments

Vienna, 16 September 2022

The South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) today joins the undersigned journalists’, media freedom, and human rights organisations in welcoming the European Commission’s initiative to strengthen the free and pluralistic media system and the commitment to protect journalists and editorial independence within the European Union.

These values directly link to fundamental rights, such as freedom of expression, the right to access to information, the formation of opinion, and making informed choices in elections, as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Matters relating to the media have traditionally been the competence of member states, however such is the threat posed to media freedom that an EU wide action has become necessary to protect Europe’s democratic values.

Therefore we support the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) which breaks significant new ground in our efforts to protect media freedom in Europe. The EMFA has identified many of the key issues where the EU and member states must urgently act in order to protect media freedoms. This statement of intent, alone, is very welcome.

However, if the EMFA is to become effective in the struggle to guarantee media pluralism, to protect journalists’ rights and ensure editorial independence from the impact of vested commercial and political interests, it should strengthen efforts to increase the transparency in media ownership with clear rules instead of soft-law Recommendations; introduce rules governing all financial relations between the state and media and removing the limit on state advertising transparency for over one million inhabitants; guarantee the independence of national regulators as well as the independence of the European Board for Media Services; and should expand measures against surveillance of journalists and ensure a general guarantee for the protection of sources.

The undersigned organisations look forward to continuing to engage with the institutions of the European Union to ensure that the text of the European Media Freedom Act is as robust and effective as possible and helps provide a foundation for generations of journalists to come.

Signed:

Association of European Journalists (AEJ)

Civil Liberties Union for Europe (Liberties)

Coalition for Creativity (C4C)

Committee to Protect Journalists

European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)

European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)

Free Press Unlimited (FPU)

Global Forum for Media Development (GFMD)

Index on Censorship

International Press Institute (IPI)

Media Diversity Institute, Belgium (MDI)

OBC Transeuropa (OBCT)

Ossigeno.info

Reporters WIthout Borders (RSF)

Society of Journalists, Warsaw

South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)

The Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation

Transparency International EU

World Association Community Radio Broadcasters (AMARC Europe)

26 August 2022 : Reaction Turkey

August 31, 2022 • • disabled comments

The International Press Institute (IPI) and 18 press freedom, freedom of expression and human rights organisations call on the Turkish Press Advertising Agency (BİK) to withdraw without delay its alarming decision to revoke the right of the independent Evrensel newspaper to receive public ads, a vital source of financial income for the publication. BİK has a regulatory duty to act as an independent and fair distributor of public ads, and not to facilitate censorship through suppressing critical news outlets.

On 22 August 2022, Evrensel newspaper received BİK’s decision backdated to July 17, 2022, revoking its right to receive public ads. This move was prompted by an audit into alleged bulk buying that distorted Evrensel’s distribution figures against which measure the advertising levels are set. The right of Evrensel to receive public advertisements has been suspended since September 2019. With the latest decision, this suspended right was completely cancelled.

In its decision, BİK stated that “the public ad ban on Evrensel was observed to be suspended for a full six months without break, excluding the period when such administrative monitoring was suspended due to the pandemic, therefore its right to receive public ads was revoked”. Evrensel has the right to appeal the decision in court. Should Evrensel be removed from BİK’s system to receive any public advertising, a new, swiftly launched application process for re-gaining the right to public ads would take at least three years. This drawn-out process would be detrimental to the newspaper’s financial stability.

In the last three years, IPI and undersigned press freedom organisations have repeatedly called on BİK to withdraw the initial public ad ban that was initiated in September 2019 on Evrensel. Ten members of the European Parliament had also joined the call with a letter to then-General Director of BİK Rıdvan Duran requesting the ban be lifted. Despite an in-person meeting with Duran in February 2020, the ad ban remained in force until this latest decision.

In a judgment issued on 10 August 2022, the Turkish Constitutional Court ruled that BİK’s arbitrary and consecutive public ad bans on newspapers including Sözcü, Cumhuriyet, Evrensel and BirGün, violated freedom of expression and press freedom as well as constituted evidence of BİK acting as a tool for systematic censorship and criminalization of news coverage in the country. The Constitutional Court’s verdict thus confirmed that BİK lacks impartiality towards media outlets.

Media freedom in recent years has been deteriorating in Turkey in light of the upcoming parliamentary and presidential elections in 2023, we are concerned about the state of remaining independent media outlets, the repercussions it will have on the right to access information for the residents of Turkey who will need to rely on the existing media outlets to make informed decisions in the election calendar, and how this will contribute to an already-shrinking civic space in the country. Hereby we once again call upon the Press Advertising Agency (BİK) in Turkey to withdraw the decision to revoke ad revenues for Evrensel.

Signatories:

International Press Institute (IPI)
ARTICLE 19
Articolo 21
Committee to Protect Journalists
Danish PEN
English PEN
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
IFEX
IPS Communication Foundation/bianet
Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA)
OBC Transeuropa (OBCT)
P24 (Platform for Independent Journalism)
PEN America
PEN Norway
PEN Türkiye
Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
Swedish PEN
The Coalition For Women In Journalism (CFWIJ)

Uluslararası Basın Enstitüsü (IPI) ve 18 uluslararası basın ve ifade özgürlüğü ve insan hakları grubu, Basın İlan Kurumu’na (BİK) bağımsız Evrensel gazetesinin kamu ilanı alma hakkına yönelik iptal kararını derhal geri çekme çağrısı yaptı. BİK, gazetelerin yayın hayatı için hayati önem taşıyan kamu ilanlarının bağımsız ve adil bir biçimde dağıtılmasında düzenleyici bir rol oynamalıdır, eleştirel haber kurumlarını baskılayarak sansür mekanizmasını yaygınlaştırmada değil.

Evrensel gazetesine 22 Ağustos 2022’de tebliğ edilen 17 Temmuz tarihli BİK kararında gazetenin kamu ilanı alma hakkının tümüyle iptal edildiği bildirildi. Bu karar, Evrensel gazetesinin tirajını “çoklu alım” ile arttırdığı iddialarını takiben başlatılan denetimlerin gerçekleştirilmesinin ardından geldi. Evrensel için gazetelerin tirajlarına göre belirlenen kamu ilanı gelirleri Eylül 2019’da denetim kararına kadar BİK tarafından durdurulmuştu. Bu son karar ile Evrensel gazetesinin kamu ilanı yayımlama hakkı tümüyle kaldırdı.

BİK kararında, “23 Mart 2020 ile 30 Nisan 2022 tarihleri arasında Kurumca mevzuat şartlarının aranmadığı salgın süreci hariç bırakılmak suretiyle altı ay içinde yayınlama hakkı yeniden devam etmediği anlaşıldığından, Günlük Evrensel gazetesinin, resmi ilan ve reklam yayınlama hakkının sona ermesine karar verilmiştir,” ifadelerini kullandı. Evrensel’in kararı önce BİK’e itiraz etmek olmak üzere mahkemede temyiz hakkı bulunuyor. Evrensel gazetesinin BİK sisteminden çıkarılması halinde, ilan yayımlama hakkının geri kazanımı için bugün başlatılacak bir başvuru sürecinin dahi en az üç yıl süreceği öngörülüyor. Bu süreç, gazetenin finansal sürdürülebilirliği açısından son derece yıkıcı etkiler doğuracaktır.

Son üç yıl içinde, IPI ve aşağıda imzası bulunan basın özgürlüğü kurumları, Eylül 2019’da verilen Evrensel’e yönelik ilan durdurma cezasının kaldırılması için BİK’e pek çok kez çağrıda bulundu. 10 Avrupa Parlamentosu üyesi, dönemin BİK Başkanı Rıdvan Duran’a ortak mektup göndererek bu çağrıya destek vermişti. Şubat 2020’de Duran ile IPI öncülüğünde yüz yüze düzenlenen bir toplantıda bu talep ve endişeler dile getirilmiş olmasına rağmen, ilan durdurma cezası kaldırılmamıştı.

Sözcü, Cumhuriyet, Evrensel ve BirGün gazetelerinin toplu başvurusuna yönelik Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin 10 Ağustos 2022 tarihli kararında, bu gazetelere verilen arka arkaya ve keyfi ilan kesme cezalarının basın ve ifade özgürlüklerini ihlal ettiğini belirtti. Ayrıca bu durumun yapısal sorunlardan kaynaklandığını belirten karar ile BİK’in ülkedeki sistematik sansür mekanizmasının bir aracı olarak hareket ettiği adeta teyit etmiş oldu. Böylelikle, AYM kararı BİK’in medya kurumlarına yönelik bağımsız yaklaşımının kaybedildiğini tasdik etti.

Son yıllarda Türkiye’deki medya özgürlüğü alanı gün geçtikçe daralıyordu. 2023 genel ve başkanlık seçimleri takvimi devam ederken, bağımsız haber yapmaya çalışan medya kuruluşlarının durumu, bilgiye dayalı karar verebilmek için var olan basın kuruluşlarına bağımlı kalan Türkiye vatandaşlarının habere erişimi üzerindeki olumsuz etkileri ve tüm bunların halihazırda daralmakta olan sivil alana olumsuz katkısı hakkında büyük endişe içerisindeyiz. O nedenle, bir kez daha Basın İlan Kurumu’na Evrensel gazetesinin ilan yayımlama hakkının iptalinin geri çekilmesi için çağrı yapıyoruz.

İmzacı kurumlar:

Uluslararası Basın Enstitüsü (IPI)
ARTICLE 19
Articolo 21
Avrupa Basın ve Medya Özgürlüğü Merkezi (ECPMF)
Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)
Danish PEN
English PEN
IFEX
IPS Communication Foundation/bianet
Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA)
OBC Transeuropa (OBCT)
P24 (Platform for Independent Journalism)
PEN America
PEN Norway
PEN Türkiye
Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
Swedish PEN
The Coalition For Women In Journalism (CFWIJ)

30 June 2022: Letter to Czech Prime MInister on eve of EU presidency and Joint Statement by NGOs

June 30, 2022 • • disabled comments

Petr Fiala, Prime Minister, Czech Republic

CC: Mikuláš Bek, Minister of Europe

CC: Charles Michel, President of the European Council

CC: Ursula Von der Leyen, President of the European Commission

June 30, 2022

—

Dear Prime Minister Fiala,

On behalf of eighteen journalists, media freedom, and human rights groups we take the opportunity of the upcoming Czech Republic’s presidency of the Council of the European Union to welcome your government’s commitment to freedom of the media and determination to advance the EU’s ability to address threats to journalism and media freedom.

The current Commission has prioritized media freedom as part of its Democracy Action Plan and has taken important initiatives in advancing the safety of journalists through the recommendations issued in September 2021, and in addressing the balance of power on the internet to preserve fundamental human rights and combat disinformation in the Digital Services Act.

In April the much-needed anti-Slapps Directive was launched and, left undiluted in its current form, can make a very significant impact on protecting journalists from being targeted by vexatious lawsuits designed to stifle public debate and prevent accountability.

And under your presidency the European Commission is due to publish the European Media Freedom Act providing a crucial opportunity to combat the threats posed to European democracy by the capture of media by political parties and governments that has become increasingly prevalent in parts of the European Union.

Media Capture as conducted by political forces can be broadly understood as the abuse of government powers to create a pliant media acting in the interests of the government. It can be divided into four key areas,

– the misuse and abuse of government funds – advertising, public subsidies or other public contracts – to boost media support for government and punish independent media

– the taking over of media regulators with politically aligned supporters that can abuse their authority to rule on media licensing and mergers in favour of pro-government media

– the manipulation of media ownership to create a bubble of government propaganda outfits – often dependent on government largess – and sidelining independent media to the edges of public debate

– the control of public media, often converted into flagrant propaganda arms.

The EMFA should address all of these areas by introducing Europe wide rules on

– Improving transparency of media ownership and funding and all financial relations between media and the government

– Ending the abuse of government funds to finance media allies and creating a hostile economic environment to independent media

– Improving the independence of media regulators, and

– Protecting public media from political interference

The Czech Presidency has an opportunity to advance the debate around the EMFA as it understands well the threat posed by media capture and the necessity for EU action.

In particular you have witnessed how public advertising and public contracts were abused by the previous Czech government to fund media close to and owned by the former Prime Minister. You have also witnessed how the appointments process for the governing bodies of the Czech TV were politicised by the previous government in an attempt to take control of the public broadcaster. And you have witnessed how media pluralism can suffer when mainstream media are taken over by oligarchs dependent on close relations with the government to protect their broader business interests.

You were elected to power on the promise of promoting media freedom, independence and pluralism and introducing reforms to end the ability of governments to abuse state funds to influence media coverage. We ask you to help replicate these actions with a strong endorsement of the European Media Freedom Act.

Kind regards,


International Press Institute (IPI)
Association of European Journalists (AEJ Belgium)
Baltic Centre for Media Excellence (BCME)
Civil Liberties Union for Europe (Liberties)
The Coalition For Women In Journalism (CFWIJ)
Cultural Broadcasting Archive (cba), Vienna
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
Finnish Foundation for Media and Development
Free Press Unlimited
Global Forum for Media Development
IFEX
Muwatin Media Network
OBC Transeuropa (OBCT)
Ossigeno.info
Public Media Alliance (PMA)
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
Society of Journalists, Warsaw

JOINT STATEMENT

The European Commission is currently finalising the draft proposal for a European Media Freedom Act (EMFA). We thank the European Commission for taking on this task and the ambition it has to deal with fundamental threats to Europe’s media landscape.

We take this opportunity, as a coalition of journalists, media freedom groups and human rights groups, to develop our statement of 9th May and to address issues around the European single market, media ownership and transparency of economic relations with the state, and how to support a vibrant, diverse and independent media sector.

We believe the following:

– Media regulation, as a principle, should be kept to the minimum, should be strictly necessary, proportionate and targeted to address specific threats to media freedom

– The current threats to media freedom and media pluralism combined with an unprecedented rise in disinformation, especially in certain member states amply shows that the European Commission is right to bring forward a Media Freedom Act

– The EMFA should establish common principles and minimum standards of transparency, regulatory independence and media pluralism particularly to address the threat posed by politically driven media capture.

– Media freedom crises in individual member states, left unchecked, threaten media freedoms across the EU.

– Countries with healthy levels of media pluralism and strong checks and balances against media capture will benefit from an EMFA that can contribute to building similar checks and balances in fellow member states.

– The EMFA should help ensure a vibrant, sustainable and economically independent media sector able to inform the public without depending on financial support tied to political agendas.

– Journalism is a public good and, where the market is no longer able to sustain quality journalism, the government has a role to intervene and ensure it can.

We believe the EMFA should address the following:

European Single Market:
– The free flow of information across the single market is essential for the efficient functioning of the market and for eliminating corruption. The growth in transnational media groups demonstrate the economic benefits of the single market to media and of the media to the single market. The growth in cross border collaborations on investigative journalism also demonstrate the necessity and demand for a Europe wide media approach.

– The EMFA can significantly boost the media economy as a whole, and cross-border media investments specifically by reducing barriers to investments in countries suffering from media capture.

– In states with significant levels of media capture, media outlets whose owners are part of the ruling party’s political circle receive preferential state funding and other economic advantages as well as favourable treatment from politicised regulatory bodies. These media are therefore granted a competitive advantage over independent media. The sum of market distortions in such cases creates a barrier to investment from potential market actors outside the government’s circle, including foreign media companies. The single market cannot function properly, let alone flourish, in such conditions.

– It is no coincidence that hostile economic environments have been created in Hungary and Poland to foreign owned media whose editorial lines are harder to bring under government control.

– Reducing these barriers and improving the free flow of information and investments across the single market will boost investments and profitability and support a vibrant independent media sector.

Transparency of media ownership and state funding
– Knowing who owns and controls the media is fundamental for democratic resilience. Unlike many types of business, media companies have the special power to shape public opinion. Transparency of media ownership and media funding is therefore a fundamental tool to ensure media plurality, accountability and independence.

– In captured media environments, the powers behind media use complex ownership structures, offshore shell companies and other tools to exploit weak ownership registers to conceal the ultimate owners.

– In captured media environments beneficial bank loans, government advertising and public contracts in other economic sectors where media owners hold investments, have all been used by governments to bribe, threaten and reward media owners in exchange for compliant media coverage.

– The EMFA must, primarily, improve transparency of media ownership and all relations between the state and media.

– Transparency will not only improve democratic accountability but will also boost media revenues by increasing the efficiency of the market and the confidence the public have in the media products.

Fair distribution of public funds to support media pluralism
– Public support for journalism, which is a public good, can play an important role in creating a viable and vibrant media sector, maintaining diversity, quality and independence.

– However, public funding comes with the risk of misuse, particularly where advertising becomes a mechanism for state aid to pro-government media

– Therefore any mechanisms in which public funds are channelled to the media – including publicly funded advertising, media subsidies and grants – must be protected by strong conflict-of-interest safeguards, conducted through arms-length, non-political decision-making bodies and subject to clear and transparent criteria which ensure funds are directed to media with the highest standards of journalism, transparency and independence.

– The EMFA can help ensure that both EU and national funds for media are distributed in a fully transparent and fair manner, benefitting especially local media, but also small and medium size (investigative) media, and start ups.

Media concentration and a media plurality test for mergers
– The EMFA should establish a mechanism for monitoring media pluralism and safeguards that limit media concentration.

– In particular there should be a media pluralism test based on the public interest, for media mergers

– It has been argued that media mergers have been necessary for media to survive in the face of competition from the internet platforms and moreover that such mergers are necessary to preserve media plurality.

– However it is also true that media concentration by ideologically driven owners in countries suffering from media capture is an immediate and pressing threat and that media concentration limits can be an essential tool for preserving plurality.

Viable and vibrant media economy
– The EMFA should ensure that journalists are being paid for their work and benefit from revenues made on the basis of content produced by them and/or the independent media they work for.

– The dominant part of advertisement and other revenues made on the basis of content produced by independent media is currently syphoned off by social media companies. The EMFA should draw lessons from experiences and experiments like the Australian News Media Bargaining Code of 2021 and other similar forms of collective bargaining agreement aimed at paying for content shared on their platforms and/or forms of taxation in order to ensure revenues flow back to independent journalism organisations and independent professional journalists

Lastly it should be noted that while this statement primarily concentrates on efforts to protect media from capture by political forces using the powers of government, we need to underline that there is a broader threat to media pluralism and independence from non-government forces in particular Big Tech, organised crime and potentially hostile states driving misinformation.

Signed:

International Press Institute (IPI)
Association of European Journalists (AEJ Belgium)
Baltic Centre for Media Excellence (BCME)
Civil Liberties Union for Europe (Liberties)
The Coalition For Women In Journalism (CFWIJ)
Cultural Broadcasting Archive (cba), Vienna
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
Finnish Foundation for Media and Development
Free Press Unlimited
Global Forum for Media Development
IFEX
Muwatin Media Network
OBC Transeuropa (OBCT)
Ossigeno.info
Public Media Alliance (PMA)
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
Society of Journalists, Warsaw

7 June 2022: Ten Press Freedom Organizations Demand An End to Systemic Police Violence Against Journalists

June 17, 2022 • • disabled comments

The Coalition For Women In Journalism and the undersigned nine national and international press freedom organizations demand an end to the systemic violence against journalists in Turkey, especially at the hands of the police. Routine weaponization of state machinery to aid in press repression in a country that claims to be a democracy is appalling. Police overreaches against the press are in blatant violation of democratic principles and the Turkish constitution. We call on the Erdoğan government to ensure effective measures to restrain the police against journalists and media workers.

The Turkish interior ministry’s failure to hold the police accountable for its overreaches and to prevent violations against the press implies complicity. The federal body oversees the police and can easily step in to prevent violence against journalists. Indifference indicates that the government is actively condoning, and benefitting from, encroachments on press freedom. The CFWIJ stresses that women journalists bear the brunt of such state policies disproportionately. We, and the undersigned press freedom defenders, call on the Turkish authorities to ensure effective measures are in place to allow journalists to report freely and without threat to their safety – from the state or otherwise.

As of June 3, the CFWIJ has documented at least 27 cases of police overreaching against journalists this year. Women journalists and media workers are routinely targeted by the police. They have been subjected to tear gas, baton charges, verbal and physical abuse, have faced excessive force, physical attacks, sexist attacks, arbitrary detentions and other types of threats in the field. The police’s hostile and aggressive attitude towards journalists is also evident in the harsh treatment meted out during raids and arbitrary “inquiries”. A sharp rise in police violence against journalists was observed this week as the authorities clamped down on public events commemorating the ninth anniversary of countrywide anti-government protests, which began in Gezi Park, İstanbul, on May 28, 2013.

On May 31, 2022, at least six journalists were detained by police in Istanbul, held overnight and prevented from covering the events at Taksim Square. Four of them were women. Flash News editors Dilan Polat, Sevda Doğan and Derin Aydoğdu, and Evrensel Daily editor Meltem Akyol were detained, beaten, held overnight and prevented from covering the events at Taksim Square. Some journalists, including at least four women, were not even allowed to reach the site and were detained while on their way. Other media workers at the public event were subjected to tear gas and manhandled by officers as police tried to disperse the crowd.

Describing the moments of her detention to the Evrensel Daily, Meltem said police officers beat her and damaged her equipment, including the camera she had strung around her neck. When Meltem told the officers that she is a journalist, a policeman said “you were not my journalist”. Another police officer threatened Meltem and said “We will show you journalism”. Meltem recounted the same in a video she posted on Twitter.

Similar incidents were reported in other public ends being held across the country to mark the 2013 protests, which lasted over a month and left scores killed and thousands injured. The next day, two female journalists were obstructed and prevented from filming a public gathering in Ankara to mark the killing of activist and protestor Ethem Sarısülük in 2013. The journalists were deliberately prevented from documenting the police’s use of excessive force to disperse the demonstrators. Despite showing their press cards, they were not allowed to reach the site.

Journalists are frequently targeted by the police while in the field and later subjected to torturous legal harassment through inquiries and trials, whereby the process serves as punishment. In this year alone, the CFWIJ has documented nine new cases and 37 ongoing cases of women journalists facing severe criminal charges for reporting on stories of public interest. Vexatious lawsuits designed to exhaust the financial and legal resources of the defendant, or SLAPPs, are commonly used to target journalists reporting news unfavorable to government higher-ups and other influential elites.

A proposed bill currently tabled before the Turkish parliament purportedly aims to combat “fake news” has been widely criticized for enabling further expansion of the government’s already controversial control over the internet and media. It also calls into question press accreditation authorized by the Directorate of Communications to existing media outlets. If enacted, the law could allow the government to further narrow down journalistic activities, critics say. The CFWIJ and the undersigned register strong protest against the draft bill. We call on the Turkish legislature to ensure the law respects the rights of the independent press as enshrined in the country’s constitution.
The CFWIJ and the undersigned stress that women journalists no longer feel safe in the field. They are harassed for their work while on the ground, in their homes and their workplaces. News media houses critical of the government are also targeted. It is extremely difficult for journalists to do their jobs while facing police violence, unwarranted raids, physical and legal harassment and detentions. The authorities must allow the independent press to do its work and hold power to account.

We invite everyone to join our campaign to raise awareness and to help us support women journalists on the ground. Join us in calling on the Turkish government to say enough to press repression, police overreaches and abuse of law to silence journalists. It is the work of the independent press to speak truth to power and hold it to account. No democracy can flourish without it and no country can hope to progress if free speech and press freedom is blatantly violated in this manner. We demand of the Turkish authorities to ensure journalists are able to report freely and safely without government interference or retaliation. Know more about violations against women journalists in Turkey here.

Signatories:
The Coalition For Women In Journalism (CFWIJ)
Avrupa Gazeteciler Birliği Türkiye Temsilciliği / Association of European Journalists (AEJ) Turkey Representative
Parlamento Muhabirleri Derneği / Parliamentary Correspondents’ Association
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
International Press Institute (IPI)
Haber-Sen / Media Communication and Postal Employees Union
Türkiye Gazeteciler Sendikası (TGS) Ankara Şubesi / Journalists’ Union of Turkey (TGS) Ankara Branch
Çağdaş Gazeteciler Derneği (ÇGD) / Progressive Journalists Association (ÇGD)
Disk Basın-İş / Turkish Press, Broadcasting and Printer Workers’ Union

8 June 2022 – International groups call on Turkey’s parliament to reject the “disinformation” bill

June 17, 2022 • • disabled comments

International groups call on Turkey’s parliament to reject the “disinformation” bill as a tool of digital censorship

Law designed to expand censorship online and criminalize free flow of information

Twenty three international media freedom, freedom of expression and journalists’ organisations today called for the immediate dismissal of the bill on “disinformation and fake news” which was submitted to the parliament on May 27 by the governing alliance of Justice and Development Party (AKP) and Nationalist Movement Party (MHP).

The bill threatens up to three years imprisonment for those found guilty of the deliberate publishing of “disinformation and fake news” intended to instigate fear or panic, endanger the country’s internal or external security, public order and general health of Turkey’s society.

Such a bill, where the definition of disinformation and ‘intent’ is left so vague, puts millions of Turkey’s internet users at risk of criminal action for posting information that the government disagrees with.

Placed in the hands of Turkey’s highly politicized judiciary, the law would become another tool for harassing journalists and activists and may cause blanket self-censorship across the internet.

The bill would also increase any sentence by 50% where information is published from anonymous user accounts. This severely undermines anonymity on the internet and further intimidates those wanting to publish evidence of corruption and wrongdoing but are afraid of the consequences of being publicly identified.

The governing alliance claim the bill is in line with the European Union’s Digital Services Act and General Data Protection Regulation, however there are no such provisions under either of these laws.

The law would also bring news sites under the Press Law (Basin Kanunu). This gives their journalists access to the official press accreditation and also to public advertising funds through the official Press Advertising Agency, Basin Ilan Kurumu (BIK). In practice however this will simply enable the government to fund pro-government news sites while banning critical media deemed to have breached the disinformation law.

In the drafting stage, the government reportedly organized a consultation with international digital platforms yet it failed to hold any meetings with media representatives, editors, journalism associations or unions, despite these groups, and their members, being the most affected by the legislation.

The draft bill is currently before the Parliament. However the role of parliament has been so heavily undermined by the Presidential system that the bill is being rushed through without proper scrutiny or debate and expected to be passed swiftly into law within days.

Disinformation is an important issue and needs to be combatted but not at the price of restricting journalists’ rights and the public’s rights of freedom of expression. Any such initiatives should be developed in close consultation with media and other stakeholders and include sufficient safeguards for free speech and independent journalism that can prevent their abuse by the government to impose arbitrary censorship.

We, therefore, call on all Turkey’s parliamentarians who believe in the parliamentary process and the free flow of ideas and information as central to a democratic society, to vote down this bill.
Signed by:
International Press Institute (IPI)
ARTICLE 19
Articolo 21
Association of European Journalists
Committee to Protect Journalists
English PEN
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
IFEX
International Federation of Journalists (IFJ)
Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA)

Media Research Association (MEDAR)

OBC Transeuropa (OBCT)
PEN America
PEN International
PEN Norway
Platform for Independent Journalism (P24)
Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
Swedish Pen
The Coalition For Women In Journalism (CFWIJ)

Turkey Human Rights Litigation Support Project

World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA)

27 May 2022 – 34 rights groups demand independent investigation into the killing of Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh

May 28, 2022 • • disabled comments

We, the undersigned organisations, call for an immediate, thorough, and independent investigation into the killing of veteran Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh in an attack in the West Bank on May 11 that also left another journalist wounded. We demand that the government of Israel and all other states fulfil their responsibility to ensure that crimes against journalists are fully investigated and prosecuted.

The killing of Abu Akleh, one of Palestine’s most widely respected journalists who had reported from the West Bank for decades, has shocked many in the region and around the world. According to Al Jazeera, Abu Akleh and three other journalists came under fire from Israeli soldiers while reporting on an Israeli military raid of a refugee camp in the city of Jenin on the West Bank. The reporters were wearing vests and helmets, clearly marked as “press.” Abu Akleh was shot in the face and Al Jazeera producer Ali Al-Samoudi was shot in the back. Al-Samoudi was treated for gunshot wounds and released from the hospital.

Eyewitness accounts, video documentation and media reports indicating that these journalists may have been deliberately targeted by Israeli soldiers have made this case all the more alarming. An analysis by independent investigative teams with Bellingcat concluded that the gunfire came from Israeli soldiers and that the shots seem to have been “both aimed and deliberate.”

We call attention to this latest case as one of a wider pattern of violence against journalists and media workers in Palestine. At least 23 journalists in Palestine have been killed since 2002, according to UNESCO data, and hundreds have been injured by or targeted with violence.

In May 2021, Israeli forces bombed the media offices of the Associated Press and Al Jazeera in Gaza Strip. That same month, an Israeli airstrike killed Voice of Al-Aqsa reporter Yousef Abu Hussein in his home. In 2018, Palestinian journalists Yaser Murtaja and Ahmed Abu Hussein were also killed while covering the Gaza border protests. Advocacy groups, including the International Federation of Journalists, have cited these cases in a recent submission to the International Criminal Court on the “systematic targeting of journalists” in the occupied Palestinian territory.

The duty to investigate: Ending impunity for crimes against journalists

States have a duty to investigate attacks on journalists promptly, thoroughly, and independently, and to prosecute those responsible. This obligation is well established in international and regional human rights instruments, as well as in numerous UN protocols and resolutions, requiring states to provide effective remedy for human rights abuses.

Israel is among the many states around the world that are failing to meet this obligation. A vast majority of murders of journalists go unresolved, which has fueled a culture of rampant impunity for violence and crimes against the press on a global level.

The obligation to investigate crimes against journalists does not disappear in a conflict zone. On the contrary, authorities are legally bound under international law and international humanitarian law to ensure the safety of journalists and media workers in situations of conflict. Moreover, a deliberate attack on a journalist during a situation of armed conflict constitutes a war crime.

The killing of Shireen Abu Akleh represents a particularly egregious attack on the press, not least because of credible reports that Abu Akleh and other journalists were intentionally targeted by Israeli forces, but also in light of growing concerns over impunity for crimes against journalists and other grave human rights abuses by Israel in the occupied Palestine territory. The Israeli government’s recent announcement that it will not investigate this killing only adds to these concerns.

We, the undersigned organisations, demand concrete action by states and other duty bearers, including international governmental organisations (IGOs) with a specific mandate in this area, to fulfil their duty to protect the safety of journalists and to ensure that attacks against the press are not carried out with impunity.

We call for:

• The government of Israel to uphold its international obligations to conduct a thorough, transparent, and independent investigation into the killing of Shireen Abu Akleh and to prosecute those responsible. This investigation must include the full involvement of independent international experts or observers and must follow UN protocols for conducting investigations into human rights abuses.

• In parallel, an international task force to investigate this attack and to ensure credibility and impartiality of procedures and outcomes. Ideally, such a task force would be led by UN special rapporteurs with mandates that include oversight over issues related to the safety of journalists or human rights abuses. This follows the precedent set by the investigation into the killing of Jamal Khashoggi initiated by Dr. Agnes Callamard, former UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions in 2019. This investigation must include the full involvement of independent international experts, as well as participation and input by journalists and civil society.

• In the absence of an independent and impartial investigation by the government of Israel, the International Criminal Court (ICC) to conduct an investigation into the circumstances of Abu Akleh’s killing and the attack on Abu Akleh and her colleagues to determine if this incident amounts to a war crime under the Rome Statute of the ICC.

• Governments, particularly allies of Israel, to hold Israel accountable to its international obligations to protect the safety of the press and for ending impunity for crimes against journalists in Palestine. Governments must also urge Israel to fully cooperate with any international inquiries into this crime as well as with other investigations into human rights abuses by Israeli forces in the occupied Palestinian territories.

• Governments to take clear measures to end impunity for crimes against journalists at the global and local levels, including through multilateral institutions and coalitions. This includes prioritising support for the creation of a standing, international multi-stakeholder task force to investigate threats and crimes against journalists, involving the participation of UN special rapporteurs, civil society, media and journalists worldwide.

Signatories:

Article 19

Association for International Broadcasting

7amleh – The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media

Afghanistan Journalists Center (AFJC)

Bahrain Center for Human Rights

Cartoonists Rights Network International (CRNI)

Cambodian Center for Human Rights

Center for Media Studies and Peacebuilding (CEMESP-Liberia)

Centre for Independent Journalism, Malaysia (CIJ)

Child Rights International Network (CRIN)

Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)

Freedom of Expression Institute (FXI)

Globe International Center

Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR)

I’lam Media Centre

Independent Journalism Center Moldova (IJC)

Index on Censorship

International Federation of Journalists (IFJ)

International Press Institute (IPI)

Maharat Foundation – Lebanon

Media Action Nepal

Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA)

Media Watch Bangladesh

Mediacentar Sarajevo

Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF)

PEN Canada

PEN International

PEN Norway

Public Media Alliance

SEENPM

South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)

Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression- SCM

World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters (AMARC)

World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA)

4 May 2011: International Call for Freedom for Arrested Turkish Journalists

May 25, 2022 • • disabled comments

International Call for Freedom for Arrested Turkish Journalists

4 May 2011 – Representatives of the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), the Association of European Journalists (AEJ), the World Association of Press Councils (WAPC), the World Editors Forum (WEF), the International Press Institue (IPI), Reporters without Borders(RSF), the South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) came together in Istanbul on the World Press Freedom Day on 3 March for the Congress on Freedom for Journalists.

The participants agreed that the struggle for journalists in Turkish prisons was an encouraging signal for other countries where press freedom was experiencing a pullback.

The congress was organized by the Turkish Freedom for Journalists Platform (GÖP). In respect to arrests of journalists like Ahmet Şık and Nedim Şener and also considering the effect of prosecutions based on news items and further oppressions against journalists, the participants defined the judicial practices as a problematic area and pointed to the government in this aspect.

Un-detained defendants and relatives or close friends of detained defendants had their say as well.

Philippe Leruth, Deputy Head of the EFJ, indicated that European countries like Hungary and France constituted examples for the tendency of a setback in press freedom for journalists.

“The press is the temperature gauge for a democracy. Yet, it does not help to break the temperature gauge because the democracy is not doing well”, Leruth said.

Javier Fernandez Arribas, Vice President of the AEJ, remarked that the government and the judiciary were used to suppress press freedom in Turkey. Arribas emphasized the need for an infrastructure that would enable the media to steer itself.

WAPC Secretary General Chris Conybeare called the more than 200 participants of the congress for a minute of silence to commemorate the journalists all over the world who lost their lives while practicing their profession. Conybeare reminded that in 1997, Turkey was the country with the highest number of arrested journalists. Targets set in 2004 fuelled great optimism for Turkey but in the present situation this optimism could not be preserved, he declared.

“The journalists should be released on bail or by other means. They have to be given the right to defence regarding the allegations brought up against them”, the WAPC representative claimed.

Chairman of the WEF board and the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers (WAN-IFRA), Erik Bjerager, said, “Journalists in Europe are not arrested for the work they do. Turkey has to improve its record”.

IPI press freedom advisor Steven Ellis underlined that arrested journalist Nedim Şener continued his efforts to gather and share information on the background of the killing of Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink despite the threats Şener had received.

Johann Bihr, head of the RSF European Desk, mentioned that press freedom in France has been on the decline for some time but in Turkey “massive violations bound to paranoiac and authoritarian applications” were being encountered. Bihr said that the arrest of journalist Ahmet Şık created a big stir in Paris. He also expressed the expectation to have the Dink murder case solved.

Mirjana Tomic from SEEMO conceded that she was not too familiar with the situation in Turkey in particular. Referring to the Balkan countries that are anticipating their accession to the European Union, Tomic highlighted the fact that the mafia is threatening press freedom regarding to labour and politics.

OSCE Media Freedom Representative Dunja Mijatovic pointed out that problems in Turkey stem from a lack of freedom to criticize the government, which is a problem encountered in other countries as well, and from the fear felt towards different opinions.

“I will continue my struggle at non-governmental organizations and before governments. Data bases on arrested journalists must be updated. There are positive indicators that the authorities are going to respond to our call. I am going to keep you informed about the developments”, Mijatovic said.

The OSCE representative announced to share the problems of press freedom in a meeting with the European Commission on Thursday (5 May). “You are not alone, we are with you”, she stressed.

Interview with SEEMO Member Meri Jordanovska

May 4, 2022 • • disabled comments

CAREER HISTORY

• Journalist, Daily newspaper “Utrinski vesnik” (2002)
• Reporter, National TV station “Sky net” (2003)
• Cooperative associate in the TV magazine “Nie” on Macedonian national television MTV (2004)
• Journalist in the political sector, daily newspaper “Vreme” (2004- 2008)
• Journalist, daily newspaper “Nova Makedonija” (2008-2010)
• Reporter, National A1 Television (2010-2011)
• Reporter in the TV magazine “Euro zoom” (2010-2012)
• Reporter in the weekly political magazine “Focus” (2011-2014)
• Journalist in the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN) (2014 – 2018)
• Assistant Editor-In-Chief in Makfax News Agency and A1on web portal (2018-present)
• Cooperative associate and lecturer in the Institute for communication studies (2020-present)

AWARDS

• Annual award, “Journalist of the year” in the newspaper “Vreme” for 2005
• Nomination for the best investigative story by the Association of journalists of Macedonia, 2007
• Expression for gratitude for best investigative story for 2008, Macedonian institute for media
• First award “Jashar Ebara” for accomplishment in the field of investigative journalism in 2014, Association of the journalists in the Republic of Macedonia
• First award “Nikola Mladenov” for best investigative story in 2015 regarding the data-base on Skopje 2014, www.skopje2014.prizma.mk, Macedonian Institute for Media
• Second award of the European Union for investigative journalism in 2015 for the investigation and database, “Skopje 2014 Uncovered”
• Third award for professional reporting on the status of the refugees during the migration movements for 2016 in Macedonia
• Second award “Nikola Mladenov“ for investigative journalism in 2017 for the investigation and database, „Foreign Investments Uncovered“
• Second award „Nikola Mladenov“ for investigative journalism in 2019

Why did you choose journalism as a career?
I wanted to become a journalist when I was seven years old and I knew that I’ll become a journalist, even though back then I didn’t imagine like this the profession. I wanted to write, a had an analytic mind, I loved expressing myself in written and back then I imagined myself writing reportages from all over the world. Instead, I finished in writing about corruption and organized crime, but at least I still write.
And at least I still love this profession because even though there are many obstacles we are facing as journalists, I still believe in unrevealing the truth, the adrenalin this profession brings and in uncovering stories that has high social interest and social impact. Through journalism, I believe in better changes in society.
You worked in many media – Vreme daily, TV A1, Nova Makedonija, Fokus, Makfax news agency, Birn. What are the differences between media in the daily work of a journalist in North Macedonia.
I think the differences depends on who is financing the media. If a media is financed through projects, then one journalist has much more time to investigate, to focus on the issues related to the project and doesn’t rely on the daily news. But, if one media depends only on commercials, then the clicks are much more important so you have to do daily news, cover daily events as quickly as possible, before the others do, you count clicks and you seek for as clickable headlines as possible. Everyone has to find what suits them more, but for me, the clickbait journalism isn’t as satisfying as in-depth and investigative stories that take much more time to cover.
Where are you working today?
I work as an editor and journalist in Metamorphosis Foundation, specifically in Thruthmeter, which mostly deals with fact-checking on contents published in media as well as social networks.
You are active also in the Commission for Complaints in the Council of Media Ethics in North Macedonia. In the reality, do journalists and media companies respect the work of the Council?
The Council of Media Ethics in North Macedonia is a self-regulatory body for the media in our country and it was established with very pure intent for professionalism in the media, without any mixing from the Government or state institutions in it. I think that so far we have accomplished a lot, but there is a long way to go. The citizens, NGOs, journalists, even politicians file complaints on certain contents published in the media, and we decide whether the Codecs of Journalists is being violated. In 2021 we have received 109 complaints and in 48 we have decided that there is a violation in journalism standards. Most of the complaints were made on the web portals (online media).
However, there are many existing problem, because not every online media that violates the Codecs is a member of the Council and not every media is registered in N. Macedonia, so even though we have complaints on certain contents and decide on them, the media doesn’t respect the decision, doesn’t publish it and continues to publish articles that are totally against the Codecs of Journalists. This is why more effort is needed in terms of media literacy in the country, because people can easily “fall” on certain news that are against every possible journalistic standard and has nothing to do with the public interest.
Can you present us a little your investigative journalism work.
I am one of the first authors of data bases in the history of the country, along with a few colleagues. We were the first to introduce data journalism, along with investigative stories. First, about the media ownership in N.Macedonia, by publishing the data base “Media Pedia” which revealed a net of shady businessmen and politicians that hide behind certain mainstream media in the country, and many of them afterwards were accused for money laundering, criminal associations etc. Also, the data base on the most expensive luxury project in the country, on Skopje 2014, revealed all the contracts between the governmental institutions and certain private companies that cost millions and millions of euros. We have revealed how much this project actually costs and some of this costs were later brought to court with suspicions on money laundering. I have also worked on stories on the apartments and costs that the members of the Assembly get from the budget, proving that some of them get apartments from the state but don’t live in them (because they already have their own) and instead they give them to relatives. All of these stories were awarded, whether by the Association of journalists, European Commission or the Macedonian Institute for Media.
You received in the past also threats and threatening messages. Why?
I have received numerous threats, mostly online, during my work. The latest one was in January 2020, when I installed Telegram on my phone, early in the morning and the member of the now oppositional party VMRO-DPMNE and also a spokesperson of the Central Registry of North Macedonia, Emil Jakimovski, started sending me messages. He claimed that I am paid from the Americans to write against the political party, he sent me pictures with handcuffs, claiming I will finish in jail and saying my picture be soon seen in a newspaper where deceased people are being published. I reported this case in the police and revealed it publicly, when I found out that this person made the same threats to many other public people and journalists. But what hurt the most is that I was contacted by his ex wife, who documented that she is struggling for years to provide justice because she was a victim of violence. That’s when I decided to go through with this case, because this woman has suffered for years, being followed, physically assaulted and threatened and the institutions did nothing. When my case went viral, the Prosecution decided to unite my case and hers and Jakimovski was sentenced 20 months in jail. He has served his sentence and now he is free. I think this might be the only case for years someone to be sentenced with jail for threats towards a journalist.
What are the main problems of journalists in North Macedonia?
The conditions they are working under and law salaries. The survey made by the Syndicate of media workers showed that half of the journalists in N. Macedonia are willing to give up journalism and start working something else, because one third of them have salaries which are under the average salary in the country. Some of them have salaries less than 300 euros, and they also have to work during weekends and far past their worktime. Also, the pressures they are facing are high, many of them have short-term contracts, their job positions are not stable and they have a lack of motive in the profession. And when there is lack of motive, there can’t be a quality journalism.
Finally, do you believe that North Macedonia will be once EU member?
I was on optimist once, but with the latest events with Bulgaria, I honestly have a lack of optimism. The question on EU-membership has become like a never ending story, so I think that what’s most important now is North Macedonia to work and resolve the main issues in the country that truly concern the citizens, because we really have a long way to go to call ourselves a “democratic country free of corruption and crime”. Once we establish a reliable court system, once we have non political institutions, once we have people employed in state institutions according to competencies and not political determination, once we have salaries and pensions according to the standards, everything else will be much easier. That is why people are not even dealing with the question on EU now, as much as they did, because there are many, many other problems they have to face with in the meantime.