Věra Jourová , Vice President of the European Commission and Commissioner for Values and Transparency (2021)

Interview with SEEMO member Anna Babinets (October 2025)

October 26, 2025 disabled comments

Anna Volodymyrivna Babinets, born 12 June 1984, is an investigative journalist from Ukraine and SEEMO member. She is the head of the independent investigative agency Slidstvo.info, a regional editor of the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), and a member of YanukovychLeaks.

9 July 2025: Ireland: Defamation Bill fails to protect public interest speech

October 3, 2025 disabled comments

On 2 July, the Dáil passed the Defamation (Amendment) Bill by 83 votes to 61. The undersigned organisations are deeply disappointed that, although the Bill contains anti-SLAPP provisions, it fails to include the robust safeguards required to meaningfully protect public interest speech. Nearly a decade after the review of the Defamation Act 2009 began, this is a frustrating outcome and a missed opportunity to protect the freedom of expression that is the lifeblood of our democracy.

The Ireland Anti-SLAPP Network – a coalition of civil society organisations, media lawyers, and academics – has engaged with the government throughout this process in an effort to improve the Bill. We had proposed three targeted amendments that would have significantly strengthened the legislation. None of these have been incorporated.

While the Bill brings in provisions that give effect to aspects of the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive – its application to domestic defamation cases is welcome – it falls short of transposing the Directive’s full set of minimum standards and protections, which Ireland is legally required to implement in full by May 2026. The anti-SLAPP provisions in the Bill apply only to defamation proceedings, even though SLAPPs frequently exploit other causes of action including privacy, copyright, and data protection to intimidate and silence public interest speech. The government has provided no clear explanation of how it intends to extend protections beyond defamation in line with its EU obligations.

The legislation also omits key components of the Directive that could have been readily included. These include provision for third-party interventions in support of SLAPP defendants (Article 9), security for damages (Article 10) and a reversal of the burden of proof (Article 12).
The legislation also fails to incorporate the protections against SLAPPs initiated in non-EU countries (Articles 16 and 17). By failing to incorporate these core safeguards, the Irish government exposes itself to potential infringement proceedings from the European Commission.

The government could and should have drawn on established international best practices, including the Council of Europe’s Recommendation on countering the use of SLAPPs. This Recommendation includes vital safeguards, such as an automatic stay of proceedings while an early dismissal motion is being heard, which are designed to protect against abusive litigation. It provides clear, practical guidance for safeguarding free expression and democratic accountability. Yet the government appears to have almost entirely disregarded it.

As the Bill goes to the Seanad today, the undersigned organisations call on senators to make the necessary amendments in order to ensure that Ireland seizes the opportunity to protect freedom of expression. If the current Bill is passed into law, journalists, human and environmental rights defenders, academics, and whistleblowers will remain vulnerable to abusive litigation aimed at silencing them. 

Jessica Ní Mhainín, Head of Policy and Campaigns at Index on Censorship, said: “It is ironic that this piece of legislation was passed in the Dáil on European Day of Action against SLAPPs because it completely fails to offer meaningful protection to SLAPP defendants. Its complex and flawed provisions risk becoming tools only accessible to those with significant legal resources — not the individuals most often targeted with SLAPPs. We need the senators to take action now to stop this inadequate Bill from being passed into law.”

Dr Francesca Farrington, Convener of the Anti-SLAPP Research Hub and Lecturer in Law at University of Aberdeen, said: “The Dáil has failed to fully transpose the minimum standards and protections required by the Directive. At a time of great threat to democracy, the rule of law, and human rights, the government has missed a vital opportunity to champion freedom of expression and protect public watchdogs. If the directive is a floor, not a ceiling, this is somewhere in the basement, but there is still time to level up.” 

Dr Eoin O’Dell, Associate Professor of Law in Trinity College Dublin, said: “For a reform process that started with so much promise, the Bill has been a series of missed opportunities and profound disappointments.
Nowhere is this clearer than in respect of its anti-SLAPP provisions, which are so grudging that they will be impotent in practice.”

Signed
Index on Censorship
Anti-SLAPP Research Hub, University of Aberdeen
ARTICLE 19 Europe
Association of European Journalists
Blueprint for Free Speech
Civic Initiatives (Serbia)
ClientEarth
Coalition For Women In Journalism
Committee to Protect Journalists
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
Foundation Atelier for Community Transformation – ACT, BiH
Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
Global Witness
IFEX
Institute for Mass Media – IMME (Cyprus)
International News Safety Institute (INSI)
International Press Institute (IPI)
The Irish Council for Civil Liberties
Justice for Journalists Foundation (JFJ)
National Union of Journalists
PEN International
Rainforest Rescue
Reporters Shield
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
Spotlight on Corruption (UK)
The Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation
The Gemini Project
Transparency International Ireland
Wikimedia Europe

11 September 2025: Türkiye / Turkey- Stop throttling social media platforms

October 3, 2025 disabled comments

11 September 2025 – Türkiye is increasingly throttling social media platforms and messaging apps to silence online communication at moments of profound political or social importance. SEEMO joins the undersigned human rights an press freedom organisations in condemning Türkiye’s actions, which isolate people from vital information, and stifle democratic participation. Türkiye must correct course and uphold its international human rights obligations. 

On 7 September at 23:45, major social media platforms and messaging services X, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, WhatsApp, Telegram, and Signal became inaccessible in Istanbul for approximately 21 hours. 

The bandwidth throttling coincided with a police blockade of the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) Istanbul headquarters. The blockade triggered a call from CHP’s Istanbul Youth Branch to gather in front of the building at 23.00 on 7 September, in protest against a temporary injunction by an Istanbul court suspending the Party’s provincial leadership and replacing it with ‘trustees’, a decision some legal experts say was beyond the court’s jurisdiction. On 11 September, a court in Ankara rejected the case for the annulment of the Party’s İstanbul provincial congress on substantive grounds.

The throttling of platforms was accompanied by attacks on peaceful assembly and growing pressure on media reporting on the tense situation. On 8 September, the police forcibly entered the CHP headquarters together with the court-appointed trustee, deploying tear gas against demonstrators, journalists, party members and staff both outside and inside the building. At least 10 people were reportedly detained and handcuffed. The Istanbul Governor’s Office had already issued a ban on public gatherings in six districts starting at 20:00 on 7 September and lasting until 11 September. In addition, the president of the Radio and Television Supreme Council (RTÜK) warned on X that outlets ‘undermining social peace and public safety’ would face administrative fines, broadcasting suspensions and, ultimately, licence revocations. This comes after major independent broadcasters TELE1, Halk TV, and SZC TV were hit with broadcast bans in recent months.  

No official explanation has been provided for the throttling as of 11 September. Under Article 60/10 of the Electronic Communications Law (Law No. 5809), the Presidency may order the Information and Communication Technologies Authority (BTK) to restrict communications without a court order where there is peril in delay, citing national security, public order, or other grounds listed under Article 22 of the Constitution. These administrative restrictions are temporary and must be brought to the judiciary within 24 hours. The competent court is required to render a decision within 48 hours thereafter. This means that communication can be cut for up to 72 hours without judicial approval. Article 60/10 was added to the Electronic Communications Law in August 2016 with a State of Emergency Decree and codified into law in November of the same year. 

Türkiye’s throttling habit 

Türkiye has a documented pattern of throttling social media platforms and messaging apps during critical events, including the February 2023 earthquakes when Twitter was throttled for about 12 hours despite urgent rescue efforts relying on it. Another example is the throttling of Instagram, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter after a bombing in November 2022.

The latest shutdown marks the second in recent months. When CHP’s 2028 presidential candidate and then-Istanbul Mayor was detained in March 2025, X, TikTok, YouTube Instagram, and Telegram were throttled in Istanbul for 42 hours. This time, the government escalated its repression by including Signal and Whatsapp, the most widely used mobile application in the country. Accessing throttled platforms and messaging
services through VPNs is not a reliable alternative in Türkiye, as most major providers have already been blocked for several years.

These restrictions are often imposed with little to no explanation. Platforms and messaging services are throttled and then quietly restored, leaving the public in a state of uncertainty. They limit the ability of journalists to report developing events of intense public interest, restrict access to vital information and stifle political dissent during moments when the public most needs open and free communication. 

Türkiye’s actions are in clear violation of international human rights law. As emphasised by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), ‘given their indiscriminate and disproportionate impacts on human rights, States should refrain from the full range of internet shutdowns’. Any restriction on freedom of expression, including the blocking of certain platforms, must be based on a clear legal basis, necessary to achieve a legitimate aim, and proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued. According to the OHCHR, any internet shutdown, including targeted ones, must further be subject to prior authorisation by a court or other independent adjudicatory body and communicated in advance to the service providers with a clear legal explanation and details regarding scope and duration. In addition, governments must provide redress mechanisms, including through judicial proceedings, to those whose rights have been affected. Türkiye repeatedly violates these requirements. It instead uses throttling measures as convenient tools in its arsenal to block people’s access to
information in politically sensitive times and to limit scrutiny of its actions.    

The undersigned human rights and press freedom organisations urge Türkiye to refrain from throttling social media platforms and messaging services. Türkiye must stop its consistent crackdown on dissenting voices and the media and uphold its international human rights obligations.  

Signatories:

ARTICLE 19
ARTICOLO 21 
Civic Space Studies Association (CSSA) 
EuroMed Rights Network
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
Human Rights Watch (HRW)
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), in the framework of
the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders 
International Press Institute (IPI)
Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA)
PEN Denmark
PEN International
P24 Platform for Independent Journalism
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), in the framework of the
Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders

30 September 2025: Letter to Officials in Germany, Italy and Czech Republic

October 3, 2025 disabled comments

Chancellor of Germany, Friedrich Merz
Federal Chancellery
Willy-Brandt-Straße 1
10557 Berlin
Germany
CC:
Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs, Johann Wadephul
Minister of State for Europe, Gunther Krichbaum
Federal Minister of Finance, Lars Klingbeil

September 30 2025

Re: Immediate suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement

Dear Chancellor,

We, the undersigned press freedom and journalist organizations, are writing to urge the German government to call for a partial or full suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement in order to protect journalists in Gaza and to advance our collective ability to access independent reporting.

The Israeli government and Israel Defense Forces are engaging in the deadliest and most deliberate effort to kill and silence journalists that press freedom organizations have ever documented. Palestinian journalists are being threatened, directly targeted and murdered by Israeli forces, and are arbitrarily detained and tortured in retaliation
for their work. Media infrastructure in Gaza is systematically destroyed, and censorship has been tightened throughout the West Bank, Jerusalem and Israel. The Israeli government has also taken the unprecedented step of refusing international media independent access to Gaza.

European public opinion on Gaza is changing, in part as a result of the reporting from Palestinian journalists on the ground. Their journalism -the stories, the personal accounts, and the images- has been a testament to the horrors suffered by the Palestinian people. It is imperative that all EU Member States continue to support Palestinian journalists as they carry out their work, while also advocating for international media–including German journalists–to have independent access to Gaza.

EU Member States are increasingly in support of suspending certain trade-related provisions of the Association Agreement between the EU and Israel– which is now a formal proposal made by the European Commission.

We kindly urge the German government to:

immediately and publicly express Germany’s support for the partial or
full suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, and encourage other EU Member States to follow suit;
strengthen the calls on Israel to immediately allow the urgent delivery of food, clean water, and medical supplies to all journalists in Gaza through protected humanitarian corridors;
strengthen the calls on Israel to end the blockade on foreign press entry into Gaza;
and robustly demand the independent investigation and prosecution of those responsible for the starvation and killing of journalists (in line with the 2015 Security Council Resolution 2222 on the protection of journalists in armed conflict).

This is a defining moment for Europe to defend its international reputation to uphold human rights and we call on Germany to take action.

Signed by:
ARTICLE 19
Association of European Journalists in Belgium
Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
IFEX
Index on Censorship
International News Safety Institute (INSI)
International Press Institute (IPI)
Media Diversity Institute
Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)
Ossigeno per l’infomazione, Ossigeno.info
Reporter ohne Grenzen e.V. (RSF)
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
Spanish Federation of Associations of Journalists (FAPE)
The Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation

Minister of Italy, Giorgia Meloni
Palazzo Chigi
Piazza Colonna 370
00187 Rome
Italy
CC:
Minister of Foreign Affairs, Antonio Tajani
Minister of European Affairs, Tommaso Foti
Minister of Economy and Finance, Giancarlo Giorgetti

September 30 2025

Re: Immediate suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement

Dear Prime Minister,

We, the undersigned press freedom and journalist organizations, are writing to urge the Italian government to call for a partial or full suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement in order to protect journalists in Gaza and to advance our collective ability to access independent reporting.

Israel is engaging in the deadliest and most deliberate effort to kill and silence journalists that press freedom organizations have ever documented. Palestinian journalists are being threatened, directly targeted and murdered by Israeli forces, and are arbitrarily detained and tortured in retaliation for their work. Media infrastructure in Gaza is systematically destroyed, and censorship has been tightened throughout the West Bank, Jerusalem and Israel. Israel has also taken the unprecedented step of refusing international media independent access to Gaza.

European public opinion on Gaza is changing, in part as a result of the reporting from Palestinian journalists on the ground. Their journalism–the stories, the personal accounts, and the images–has been a testament to the horrors suffered by the Palestinian people. It is imperative that all EU Member States continue to support Palestinian journalists as they carry out their work, while also advocating for international media–including Italian journalists–to have independent access to Gaza.

A sense of outrage is also mounting in the journalist community, including public actions attended by hundreds of Italian journalists and a written appeal made by 32 Italian newspapers addressed to the Italian government calling for journalist access to Gaza.

EU Member States are increasingly in support of suspending certain trade-related provisions of the Association Agreement between the EU and Israel– which is now a formal proposal made by the European Commission.

We kindly urge the Italian government to:

immediately and publicly express Italy’s support for the partial or full suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, and encourage other EU Member States to follow suit;

strengthen the calls on Israel to immediately allow the urgent delivery of food, clean water, and medical supplies to all journalists in Gaza through protected humanitarian corridors;
strengthen the calls on Israel to end the blockade on foreign press entry into Gaza;
and robustly demand the independent investigation and prosecution of those responsible for the starvation and killing of journalists (in line with the 2015 Security Council Resolution 2222 on the protection of journalists in armed conflict).

This is a defining moment for Europe to defend its international reputation to uphold human rights and we call on Italy to take action.

Signed by:
ARTICLE 19
Association of European Journalists in Belgium
Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
IFEX
Index on Censorship
International News Safety Institute (INSI)
International Press Institute (IPI)
Media Diversity Institute
Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)
Ossigeno per l’infomazione, Ossigeno.info
Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
Spanish Federation of Associations of Journalists (FAPE)
The Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation

President of the Czech Republic, Petr Pavel
Office of the President of the Republic
Hrad I. nádvoří č. p. 1, Hradčany
119 08 Prague 1
Czech Republic
Prime Minister of the Czech Republic, Petr Fiala
Government Office of the Czech Republic
nábřeží Edvarda Beneše 4
118 01 Prague 1
Czech Republic
CC:
Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jan Lipavský
Minister of European Affairs, Martin Dvořák
Minister of Finance, Zbyněk Stanjura

September 30 2025

Re: Immediate suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement

Dear President,
Dear Prime Minister,

We, the undersigned press freedom and journalist organizations, are writing to urge the Czech government to call for a partial or full suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement in order to protect journalists in Gaza and to advance our collective ability to access independent reporting.

Israel is engaging in the deadliest and most deliberate effort to kill and silence journalists that press freedom organizations have ever documented. Palestinian journalists are being threatened, directly targeted and murdered by Israeli forces, and are arbitrarily detained and tortured in retaliation for their work. Media infrastructure in Gaza is systematically destroyed, and censorship has been tightened throughout the West Bank, Jerusalem and Israel. Israel has also taken the unprecedented step of refusing international media independent access to Gaza.

European public opinion on Gaza is changing, in part as a result of the reporting from Palestinian journalists on the ground. Their journalism–the stories, the personal accounts, and the images–has been a testament to the horrors suffered by the Palestinian people. It is imperative that all EU Member States continue to support Palestinian journalists as they carry out their work, while also advocating for international media–including Czech journalists–to have independent access to Gaza.

A sense of outrage is mounting in the journalist community, including the open letter sent by 262 Czech journalists, addressed to you Mr President and the Czech government, in support of journalists in Gaza.

EU Member States are increasingly in support of suspending certain trade-related provisions of the Association Agreement between the EU and Israel– which is now a formal proposal made by the European Commission.

We kindly urge the Czech government to:

immediately and publicly express the Czech Republic’s support for the partial or full suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, and encourage other EU Member States to follow suit;
strengthen the calls on Israel to immediately allow the urgent delivery of food, clean water, and medical supplies to all journalists in Gaza through protected humanitarian corridors;
call on Israel to end the blockade on foreign press entry into Gaza;
and robustly demand the independent investigation and prosecution of those responsible for the starvation and killing of journalists (in line with the 2015 Security Council Resolution 2222 on the protection of journalists in armed conflict).

This is a defining moment for Europe to defend its international reputation to uphold human rights and we call on the Czech Republic to take action.

Signed by:
ARTICLE 19
Association of European Journalists in Belgium
Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
IFEX
Index on Censorship
International News Safety Institute (INSI)
International Press Institute (IPI)
Media Diversity Institute
Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)
Ossigeno per l’infomazione, Ossigeno.info
Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
Spanish Federation of Associations of Journalists (FAPE)
The Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation

Prezident České republiky, Petr Pavel
Kancelář prezidenta republiky
Hrad I. nádvoří č. p. 1, Hradčany
119 08 Praha 1
Česká republika
Premiér České republiky, Petr Fiala
Úřad vlády České republiky
nábřeží Edvarda Beneše 4
118 01 Praha 1
Česká republika
Kopie:
Ministr zahraničních věcí, Jan Lipavský
Ministr pro evropské záležitosti, Martin Dvořák
Ministr financí, Zbyněk Stanjura
září 2025
Věc: Okamžité pozastavení Asociační dohody mezi EU a Izraelem

Vážený pane prezidente,
Vážený pane premiére,

My, níže podepsané organizace pro svobodu tisku a novinářské organizace, se obracíme na českou vládu s žádostí o částečné nebo úplné pozastavení Asociační dohody mezi EU a Izraelem s cílem ochránit novináře v Gaze a posílit naši kolektivní schopnost přístupu k nezávislému zpravodajství.

Izrael se zapojuje do nejsmrtelnějšího a nejpromyšlenějšího úsilí o zabíjení a umlčování novinářů, jaké kdy organizace pro svobodu tisku zdokumentovaly. Palestinští novináři jsou izraelskými silami ohrožováni, přímo terčem útoků a vražděni a jsou svévolně zadržováni a mučeni jako odveta za svou práci. Mediální infrastruktura v Gaze je systematicky ničena a cenzura byla zpřísněna na celém Západním břehu Jordánu, v
Jeruzalémě a Izraeli. Izrael také učinil bezprecedentní krok a odmítl mezinárodním médiím nezávislý přístup do Gazy.

Evropské veřejné mínění o Gaze se mění, částečně v důsledku reportáží palestinských novinářů z terénu. Jejich žurnalistika – příběhy, osobní svědectví a fotografie – je svědectvím o hrůzách, které palestinský lid trpí. Je nezbytné, aby všechny členské státy EU i nadále podporovaly palestinské novináře při výkonu jejich práce a zároveň se zasazovaly o to, aby mezinárodní média – včetně českých novinářů – měla nezávislý
přístup do Gazy.

V novinářské komunitě narůstá pocit pobouření, včetně otevřeného dopisu, který 262 českých novinářů zaslalo Vám, pane prezidente, a české vládě, na podporu novinářů v Gaze.

Členské státy EU stále více podporují pozastavení některých obchodních ustanovení dohody o přidružení mezi EU a Izraelem – což je nyní formální návrh Evropské komise.

Vyzýváme českou vládu, aby:

okamžitě a veřejně vyjádřila podporu České republiky částečnému nebo úplnému pozastavení dohody o přidružení mezi EU a Izraelem a vyzvala ostatní členské státy EU, aby následovaly tento příklad;

zesílila výzvy Izraeli, aby okamžitě umožnil naléhavé dodávky potravin, čisté vody a zdravotnického materiálu všem novinářům v Gaze prostřednictvím chráněných humanitárních koridorů;

vyzvala Izrael, aby ukončil blokádu vstupu zahraničních tiskových služeb
do Gazy;

a důrazně požadovala nezávislé vyšetřování a stíhání osob odpovědných za

hladovění a zabíjení novinářů (v souladu s rezolucí Rady bezpečnosti OSN č. 2222 o ochraně novinářů v ozbrojeném konfliktu z roku 2015).

Toto je rozhodující okamžik pro Evropu, aby bránila svou mezinárodní pověst v oblasti dodržování lidských práv, a vyzýváme Českou republiku, aby podnikla kroky.

Níže podepsaní:
ARTICLE 19
Association of European Journalists in Belgium
Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
IFEX
Index on Censorship
International News Safety Institute (INSI)
International Press Institute (IPI)
Media Diversity Institute
Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)
Ossigeno per l’infomazione, Ossigeno.info
Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
Spanish Federation of Associations of Journalists (FAPE)
The Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation

9 June 2025: SEEMO and other IFEX members calls on the Venezuelan government to immediately release Eduardo Torres

October 3, 2025 disabled comments

We, the undersigned civil society organisations, are writing to you urgently to request the immediate release of Eduardo Torres, a lawyer, teacher, trade unionist, and human rights defender, and a member of the Venezuelan Program for Human Rights Education-Action (PROVEA), who is currently detained, isolated, and incommunicado.

On May 9, 2025, Eduardo disappeared and for eight days there was no information on his whereabouts. Although officials finally publicly acknowledged his detention on May 13, there was no further are also unknown. Eduardo’s family and lawyers submitted a habeas corpus appeal, which judicial authorities information provided regarding the date, time, place or security force that carried out the arrest. There has also been no information from the Prosecutor’s Office that would be responsible for overseeing an investigation, nor on the existence of any arrest warrant. Charges against him initially rejected, before accepting it on May 12. The appeal is still pending a response.

The process against Eduardo Torres has lacked transparency and access to timely information for his family and legal counsel of his own choosing. A month later, neither family members nor trusted lawyers have had any kind of contact with him and have not been able to verify his conditions of detention or health situation. The family have only been able to contact the public defender assigned to his case, who informed them that
there is a visitation ban for Eduardo, thus violating his right to due process, communication and legitimate defence.

Concerned stakeholders, including international human rights protection systems such as the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, United Nations bodies, and hundreds of international organizations have demanded his immediate release.

We take this opportunity to remind the Venezuelan authorities that, in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other relevant international human rights standards, they must guarantee that human rights defenders can carry out their work freely and safely, without fear of harassment, reprisals or imprisonment.

We urge you as an authority of the State of Venezuela to take measures that will:

Allow Eduardo regular communication with family members and trusted lawyers, in compliance with international and constitutional legal obligations and in respect for his right to due process; Facilitate his access to his trusted lawyers; and Grant his full and immediate release.

Signed,

Alianza Regional por la Libre Expresión e Información
Artículo 19 (Mexico and Central America)
Association for Freedom of Thought and Expression (AFTE)
Belarusian Association of Journalists
Canadian Journalists for Free Expression
Centre for Media and Society (CEMESO)
Centro de Archivos y Acceso a la Información Pública
Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)
Derechos Digitales
Freedom of Expression Institute (FXI)
Global Voices
Global Voices Advox
IFoX / Initiative for Freedom of Expression- Turkey
Independent Journalism Center (IJC)
Index on Censorship
Instituto de Prensa y Libertad de Expresión – IPLEX
Instituto Prensa y Sociedad
Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA)
National Press Association
OpenMedia
Pacific Islands News Association (PINA)
Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA)
PEN America
PEN Canada
SFLC.in
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)

15 October 2025: In Memory of Daphne – Media reform public consultations must lead to National Action Plan

September 15, 2025 disabled comments

In Memory of Daphne: Media reform public consultations must lead to National Action Plan

15 October 2025

On the eve of the anniversary of the murder of Maltese investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia, press freedom and journalists’ groups are calling on the national authorities to set up a National Action Plan on Media Freedom and Journalist Safety.

Our groups reiterate our calls for all perpetrators of the murder to be brought to justice and we continue to monitor the progress of ongoing legal proceedings.

I. Overview:

Press freedom and journalist organizations welcome the call by the Maltese authorities for public consultations on media freedom and are, in this paper, submitting a set of recommendations for consideration.

The implementation of such recommendations would be an appropriate and meaningful way to continue to mark the life and legacy of Daphne Caruana Galizia, who was killed in a car bomb attack on 16 October 2017.

The move to open up public consultations follows an ongoing exchange on institutional and rule of law reforms in Malta, whose record has been the subject of international scrutiny since the journalist’s murder eight years ago.

Such reforms present a historic opportunity for press freedom in both Malta and Europe. Press freedom and journalists’ groups call for draft legislation related to reforms to be considered for consultation, including by national and international civil society, journalists’ organizations, media freedom experts, the Council of Europe, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), prior to being enacted by parliament or published by legal notice.

Our organizations are tracking the reform proposal put forward by the Maltese authorities in response to the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA). Some recommendations below identify areas of concern that continue to require a more effective state response than outlined in the August 2025 legal notice.

This statement seeks to provide an overview of key international standards or texts that would provide a basis for shaping the planning and implementation of future legislative and non-legislative measures to protect journalists. It also provides a list of recommendations, in consideration of Malta’s press freedom context.

Such reforms should be brought together in a National Action Plan on Media Freedom and Journalist Safety. Such an initiative should seek to concretely address the complex set of challenges facing all Maltese journalists, and guarantee an ambitious vision for Malta’s compliance with its European Union, Council of Europe and OSCE obligations.

II. Relevant international standards and expert sources:

The following international standards and texts provide guidance on the questions raised in the consultation, including safeguarding an enabling environment for journalists to operate, preserving full and independent access to information, and aligning all measures with international standards on the protection of the reputation or rights of others.

United Nations

– Civil and Political Rights, including the Question of Freedom of Expression, the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Report of the Special Rapporteur, Ambeyi Ligabo, 30 December 2005 (E/CN.4/2006/55)

– General Comment No. 34, Article 19: Freedoms of opinion and expression, United Nations, Human Rights Committee, 11-29 July 2011 (CCPR/C/GC/34)

– General Assembly, Resolution 68/163, The Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity, 18 December 2013 (A/RES/68/163)

– General Assembly, Resolution 39/6, The Safety of Journalists, Human Rights Council
27 September 2018 (39th Session) (A/HRC/RES/39/6)

UNESCO, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation

– UN Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity (2012)

Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly

– Parliamentary Assembly, Recommendation 1506 (2001), Freedom of expression and information in the media in Europe, Council of Europe, 24 April 2001

– Parliamentary Assembly, Recommendation 1589 (2003), Freedom of expression in the
media in Europe, Council of Europe, 28 January 2003

– Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution 1535 (2007), Threats to the lives and freedom of expression of journalists, 25 January 2007

– Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution 2035 (2015), Protection of the safety of journalists and of media freedom in Europe, 29 January 2015

– Parliamentary Assembly, Recommendation 2062 (2015), Protection of the safety of journalists and of media freedom in Europe, Council of Europe, 29 January 2015

– Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution 2317 (2020), Threats to media freedom and journalists’ security in Europe, Council of Europe, 28 January 2020

Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers

– CM/Rec(2024)2 – Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member States on countering the use of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs), adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 5 April 2024

– CM/Rec(2022)16 – Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member States on combating hate speech, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 May 2022

– CM/Rec(2016)4 – Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the protection of journalism and safety of journalists and other media actors, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 April 2016

European Court of Human Rights case-law on state interference or restriction on freedom of expression:

Stoll v. Switzerland, App No 69698/01, (ECtHR [GC] 10 December 2007)
Morice v. France, App. No. 29369/10, (ECtHR [GC] 23 April 2015)
Pentikäinen v. Finland, App No 11882/10, (ECtHR [GC] 20 October 2015)
Khadja Ismayilova v. Azerbaijan, App Nos 65286/13 and 57270/14, (ECtHR 10 January 2019)
Yılmaz and Kılıç v. Turkey, App No 68514/01, (ECtHR 17 July 2008)
Bahçeci and Turan v. Turkey, App. No. 33340/03, (ECtHR 16 June 2009) para 26.

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, OSCE

Legal analysis on the draft law of Malta to implement various measures for the protection of the media and of journalists, October 2021

Legal analysis on the draft law of Malta to implement various measures for the protection of the media and of journalists, February 2022

European Commission

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/1534 of 16 September 2021 on ensuring the protection, safety and empowerment of journalists and other media professionals in the European Union

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2022/758 of 27 April 2022 on protecting journalists and human rights defenders who engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings (“Strategic lawsuits against public participation”)

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2022/1634 of 16 September 2022 on internal safeguards for editorial independence and ownership transparency in the media sector

III. Recommendations

1. Establish a National Action Plan – In line with the Council of Europe’s “Journalists Matter” campaign, develop and adopt a National Action Plan on Media Freedom and Journalist Safety to provide a strategic framework to coordinate action across all state institutions. Such an action plan should integrate the recommendations listed below (to the fullest extent possible), and should follow further broad, public and transparent consultations, timeframes, clear and measurable benchmarks for progress, and effective and independent evaluation processes. It would have full political backing; would be led by a person or persons with experience and knowledge of the media (and the threats to the media); and would have the full trust of the journalist community and their representative organizations.

2. Set up an institutional response structure
– Establish an interministerial, cross-institutional structure for the protection of journalists and journalism, with a view to implementing the National Action Plan, setting up rapid response protocols and early warning mechanisms, regular communication and dialogue on press freedom concerns affecting Malta’s journalists, and building state accountability for protecting journalists. Such a structure should ensure effective engagement with civil society and media organizations, and have, as its purpose, the full implementation of the 2016 Committee of Ministers Recommendation on journalism safety and the European Commission’s 2021 Journalist Safety Recommendation. This requires that the current mechanism be transformed to meet international standards
including by taking into consideration the OSCE legal analysis of the draft law setting up this mechanism.

3. Undertake Constitutional reform
– Undertake Constitutional reform to enshrine journalism as one of the pillars of a democratic society, with an explicit requirement of the State to guarantee it and protect it.
– Recognize the right to access information held by the State and public administration and the obligation of public authorities to provide such information.
– Provide all relevant state officials with training and support to promote and protect the spirit of such constitutional reforms.

4. Foster an enabling environment for journalists
– High level officials should regularly communicate publicly, with a view to reaching a wide audience, that verbal attacks, threats, and hostility against the press should never in any way be tolerated; underscore the important role that journalists play in society and call for their full protection. Such statements could coincide with the celebration of international days, including World Press Freedom Day, as well as parliamentary debates, or public and official events.
– State officials and public figures should refrain from undermining or attacking the integrity of journalists and other media actors, or coercing or pressuring journalists.
– Provide journalists and other media actors who are victims of crime with quick access to preventive measures of protection, including court-issued protection orders and other personal protection measures taken by the police.
– Provide training for judges, prosecutors, lawyers, and police officers on relevant Council of Europe (and other relevant international) standards on freedom of expression and media freedom.

5. Support female journalists
– Monitor and prioritize measures to protect female journalists against all forms of psychological pressure, intimidation, harassment, or physical threats, including as a result of online harassment, in line with the European Commission’s 2021 Journalist Safety Recommendation and the OSCE’s 2023 Guidelines for monitoring online violence against female journalists.

6. End vexatious lawsuits, including SLAPPs
– Undertake further legislative reforms to address SLAPPs, in addition to the government’s recent transposition of the EU anti-SLAPP Directive, to extend judicial protection to domestic SLAPPs cases.
– Implement in full the European Commission’s Recommendation on SLAPPs as well as the Committee of Ministers Recommendation on SLAPPs; and, in doing so, extend Malta’s actions to both judicial reform and nonjudicial measures, such as victim support, judicial training, and public awareness.
– Reform the Media and Defamation Act to bring it in line with the recommendations included in the Legal Analysis of the OSCE Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media of November 2017.

7. Strengthen access to information
– Take immediate steps to improve the swift delivery of information held by public authorities, and grant greater transparency with regards to the publication of official information in the public interest. Such improvements should be user friendly, efficient and embedded in a culture of accountability and openness.
– Disclose, in full, the legal advice received by the Government on the Freedom of Information Act, and undertake a full, transparent, and effective consultation for its reform.

8. Build accountability by implementing the public inquiry recommendations
Ensure the full implementation of all the recommendations from the Daphne Caruana Galizia public inquiry, including those recommendations that relate to economic wrongdoing and financial crime, in their intersection of addressing the work of Maltese investigative journalists regarding state accountability, including:
1. Amendments to criminal laws;
2. Administrative practices which regulate relationships between public administration and business people;
3. The fight against financial crime;
4. Public officials who interfere with or attempt to interfere with the police;
5. The introduction in the Criminal Code of the new criminal offence of “abuse of office” committed by a public official;
6. The introduction into the Criminal Code of the criminal offence of obstruction of justice;
7. The introduction of legal provisions in the Code of Ethics to counter inappropriate behavior by public officials.

9. Ensure self-regulation contributes to safeguarding international standards
– Ensure that any changes to the regulatory ecosystem for media in Malta do not risk being misused for increased state interference.
Self-regulation should be promoted and enabled by the authorities and all relevant stakeholders. Effective and independent systems of self-regulation must have the trust and confidence of the Maltese journalist community, and to the fullest extent possible, apply the European standards defined by the European Press Councils as part of the research and best practice developed by the European Union’s PressCouncils.eu project.

10. Safeguard source confidentiality
– Develop protocols for law enforcement to embed the legal protection of legitimate and journalistic sources, including as part of investigation  or operations. Such protocols should ensure that if investigative or intelligence collecting work by the Malta Security Service and or the police involves or touches upon the relationship of journalists and sources or whistleblowers, that the identity of that source or whistleblower will not be disclosed.
– The Protection of the Whistleblower Act must be reformed to provide whistleblowers with avenues for safe reporting, independent from government.

11. Guarantee independent public service media
– In line with Article 5 of the EMFA, undertake reform of the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) to develop stronger institutional safeguards which protect it from all forms of political pressure and influence and increase its editorial independence, thus building public trust.
– Include transparent and democratic procedures for the election of all management staff and members to its oversight boards, to reduce potential political interference. Heads of public service media should in particular be required to adhere to transparent and impartial criteria in their appointment procedures, with a view to preventing
undue political influence.
– Provide adequate, predictable and sustainable funding to the public broadcaster in order to create additional institutional barriers to prevent pressure from the government. Multiyear budgeting should be adopted to facilitate long-term strategic planning and enhance predictability.

12. Ensure full transparency over the allocation of state advertising to media and establish an independent body to oversee this system
– In line with Article 25 of the EMFA, establish a registry for oversight of state advertising, which must be transparent, functional, and provide up-to-date and easily accessible data for journalists and citizens.
– Ensure this body is independent and issues annual reports on the distribution of funds, identifying any instances of preferential treatment or political influence.
– Award state advertising in accordance with transparent, objective, proportionate, and nondiscriminatory criteria. This should apply to allocation of advertising via public tenders, directly or indirectly, and via advertising agencies.
– Government agencies and state-run or -controlled companies should provide full transparency on advertising expenditure, while all media should disclose the total amount they receive from public funds.

13. Increase transparency over media ownership
– In line with Article 6 of the EMFA, establish a national media ownership database which is public, transparent, up-to-date and easily accessible online. This centralized online registry should require data regarding the ownership structure, including both direct and nondirect ownership, as well as the identity of any beneficial owners.
– Document swiftly all acquisitions and mergers of media in the database. Noncompliance with requests for information on all aspects of ownership should be addressed through administrative measures or penalties.

14. Prevent a high degree of concentration of ownership in the media sector
– In line with Article 22 of the EMFA, establish a coordinated system for the assessment of all new market developments that could lead to concentrations and have a significant impact on media pluralism and editorial independence.
– Adopt procedural rules to assess the impact of new acquisitions or mergers on media pluralism, as the Maltese media legislation does not contain specific thresholds or other limitations in order to prevent a high degree of horizontal and cross-media concentration of ownership in the media sector.
– Introduce measures that guarantee transparency and provide clear thresholds to prevent market concentration, including in the online environment.
– Designate an appropriate authority to monitor and measure media pluralism and to advise the competition authority in order to stop ownership changes that damage media pluralism and threaten editorial independence.
– Provide proper statistics on market shares and media revenues.
– Codify protections to journalists from political interference. Cooperate with the Institute of Maltese Journalists and other stakeholders to make sure protections are adequate.

Signed:

– Association of European Journalists (AEJ)
– Civil Liberties Union for Europe
– Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)
– European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
– European Federation of Journalists
– Global Forum for Media Development
– IFEX
– Institute for Reporters’ Freedom and Safety (IRFS)
– International Press Institute (IPI)
– Media Diversity Institute
– Ossigeno per l’Informazione
– PEN International
– Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
– Society of Journalists (Warsaw)
– South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
– Spanish Federation of Journalists (FAPE)

4 July 2025 : Türkiye- Arrest warrant issued against journalist and poet Nedim Türfent condemned

July 5, 2025 disabled comments

Written By PEN International

04 July 2025 – PEN International joins international free expression, media freedom, human rights and journalists’ organisations in expressing deep concern over reports that an arrest warrant has been issued for the Kurdish writer, journalist and poet Nedim Türfent on the charge of “disseminating propaganda in favour of a terrorist organisation”.
Türfent is currently living in exile in Germany due to the ongoing persecution he has faced by the Turkish authorities. While the arrest warrant was issued on 7 May 2025 by the Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office of Yüksekova district in Hakkari, Türfent was only made aware of it on 25 June. The existence of the warrant was made public by the Dicle Firat Journalists’ Association (DFG) on 27 June.

This is the latest in a litany of threats and judicial harassment aimed
at Türfent in recent years. He spent six years and seven months in prison after he was detained in May 2016 in response to his reporting on special police forces’ ill-treatment of Kurdish workers. This came amidst a severe clampdown on public interest journalism, where Kurdish writers and journalists were explicitly targeted. According to PEN International, as a result of his reporting he “began receiving death threats from the police and was the target of an online harassment campaign.” The day after his arrest, he was formally charged with “membership of a terrorist organisation”. Out of the 20 witnesses called during the court hearings, 19 retracted their statements, saying they had been extracted under torture. Türfent spent almost two years in solitary confinement. After spending over 2,400 days behind bars, he was released on 29 November 2022.  

As reported by DFG, the basis of the warrant appears to be four 
news-related posts and retweets Türfent shared on his X account. The charge of “disseminating propaganda in favor of a terrorist organisation”, outlined in Article 7 of Türkiye’s Anti-Terror Law (Law no. 3713), has long been used to stifle critical speech or public interest reporting. In 2024, 82 accounts on X, including those used by Kurdish politicians, journalists, publishers and media houses, were blocked by Turkish courts on the basis of this charge, as well as other provisions commonly used to restrict free expression. Other journalists and civil society representatives, including Erol Önderoğlu (Reporters Without Borders representative in Türkiye and International Press Institute member), Şebnem Korur Fincancı (Chair of  Human Rights Foundation of Türkiye) and writer Ahmet Nesin have also been charged under this provision in 2016. While they were acquitted, this verdict was overturned in October 2020. 

As Türfent is now based in Germany, the warrant may result in an 
extradition request. Türkiye has long requested the extradition of those in exile, many of whom were targeted for their criticism of the ruling party and President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan or for acts of public interest journalism. For instance, in 2017, a year after the failed coup, it was reported that Türkiye had requested the extradition of 81 people from Germany. While German courts have previously rejected a number of requests on human rights grounds and in reference to the European Court of Human Rights, we are deeply concerned by the possibility of Türfent being forcibly returned to Türkiye. This fear is enhanced by the fact that his visa expires at the end of August 2025.

We, the undersigned, condemn the issuance of this arrest warrant 
targeting Türfent for acts of protected speech and for his work as a journalist. Speaking to Index on Censorship in 2023 about his persecution, Türfent said: “My journalism was then declared a ‘crime’.” 
This cannot happen again, and we call for the warrant to be retracted without delay. We will continue to monitor the situation.

Signed by

Index on Censorship
ARTICLE 19
Articolo 21
Association of European Journalists (AEJ)
Association of Lawyers for Freedom (ÖHD)
Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)
Croatian PEN Centre
Danish PEN
Deutsche Journalistinnen und Journalisten Union (dju) in ver.di
Dicle Firat Journalists’ Association (DFG)
DİSK Basın-İş
English PEN
European Center for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
Gefangenes Wort 
Giuristi Democratici Association – Italy  
Human Rights Association (İHD)
IFEX
International Federation of Journalists (IFJ)
International Press Institute (IPI) 
International Society for Human Rights (ISHR)
Internationale Gesellschaft für Menschenrechte (IGFM)
Journalists’ Union of Turkey (TGS)
Kurdish PEN
Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA)
P24 Platform for Independent Journalism 
PEN America
PEN Català
PEN Esperanto
PEN International 
PEN Melbourne
PEN Netherlands
PEN Norway
PEN Sweden
PEN Sydney
Progressive Lawyers’ Association (ÇHD), Turkey
Research and Development Center for Democracy (CRED)
San Miguel PEN
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
Stimmen der Solidarität – Mahnwache Köln e.V.
Vietnamese Abroad PEN Centre
Wahrheitskämpfers e. V.

************************

Türkiye : Mandat d’arrêt contre le journaliste et poète Nedim Türfent
condamné

04 juillet 2025 – PEN International se joint aux organisations internationales de défense de la liberté d’expression, de la liberté des médias, des droits de l’homme et des journalistes pour exprimer sa profonde inquiétude face aux informations selon lesquelles un mandat d’arrêt a été émis à l’encontre de l’écrivain, journaliste et poète
kurde Nedim Türfent, accusé de “diffusion de propagande en faveur d’une organisation terroriste”. Nedim Türfent vit actuellement en exil en Allemagne en raison des persécutions dont il fait l’objet de la part des autorités turques. Le mandat d’arrêt a été délivré le 7 mai 2025 par le bureau du procureur général du district de Yüksekova à Hakkari, mais Türfent n’en a eu connaissance que le 25 juin. L’existence du mandat a
été rendue publique par le bureau des journalistes de Dicle Firat. Association des journalistes de Dicle Firat (DFG) le 27 juin. 

Il s’agit de la dernière d’une série de menaces et de harcèlement 
judiciaire à l’encontre de Türfent au cours des dernières années. Il a passé six ans et sept mois en prison après avoir été arrêté en mai 2016 à la suite de son reportage sur les mauvais traitements infligés par les forces spéciales de la police aux travailleurs kurdes. Cela s’est produit dans le cadre d’une répression sévère du journalisme d’intérêt public, où les écrivains et les journalistes kurdes ont été explicitement ciblés. Selon PEN Internationalil a commencé à recevoir des menaces de mort de la part de la police et a été la cible d’une campagne de harcèlement en ligne. Le lendemain de son arrestation, il a été officiellement accusé d'”appartenance à une organisation terroriste”. Sur les 20 témoins cités lors des audiences du tribunal, 19 sont revenus sur leurs déclarations, affirmant qu’elles leur avaient été arrachées sous la torture. Türfent a passé près de deux ans à l’isolement. Après avoir passé plus de 2 400 jours derrière les barreaux, il a été libéré le 29 novembre 2022.  

Comme le rapporte le DFG, le mandat semble se fonder sur quatre messages 
et retweets liés à l’actualité que Türfent a partagés sur son compte X. L’accusation de “diffusion de propagande en faveur d’une organisation terroriste”, énoncée à l’article 7 de la loi antiterroriste de la Turquie (loi n° 3713), a longtemps été utilisée pour étouffer les discours critiques ou les reportages d’intérêt public. En 2024, 82 comptes sur X, y compris ceux utilisés par des politiciens kurdes, des journalistes, des éditeurs et des maisons de presse, ont été bloqués par les tribunaux turcs sur la base de cette accusation, ainsi que d’autres dispositions couramment utilisées pour restreindre la liberté d’expression. D’autres journalistes et représentants de la société civile, dont Erol Önderoğlu (représentant de Reporters sans frontières en Turquie et membre de l’Institut international de la presse), Şebnem Korur Fincancı (président de la Fondation des droits de l’homme de Turquie) et l’écrivain Ahmet Nesin ont également été inculpés sur la base de cette disposition en 2016. Ils ont été acquittés, mais ce verdict a été annulé en octobre 2020. 

Comme Türfent est désormais basé en Allemagne, le mandat pourrait donner 
lieu à une demande d’extradition. La Türkiye demande depuis longtemps l’extradition des personnes en exil, dont beaucoup ont été ciblées pour leurs critiques du parti au pouvoir et du président Recep Tayyip Erdoğan ou pour des actes de journalisme d’intérêt public. Par exemple, en 2017, un an après le coup d’État manqué, il a été rapporté que la Turquie avait demandé l’extradition de 81 personnes depuis l’Allemagne. Alors que les tribunaux allemands ont précédemment rejeté un certain nombre de demandes pour des raisons liées aux droits de l’homme et en référence à la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, nous sommes profondément préoccupés par la possibilité que Türfent soit renvoyé de force en Türkiye. Cette crainte est renforcée par le fait que son visa expire à la fin du mois d’août 2025. 

Nous, soussignés, condamnons l’émission de ce mandat d’arrêt visant 
Türfent pour des actes d’expression protégés et pour son travail de journaliste. S’adressant à Index on Censorship en 2023, Türfent a déclaré à propos de sa persécution : Mon travail de journaliste a alors été qualifié de “crime”. Cela ne peut plus se reproduire et nous demandons que le mandat d’arrêt soit rétracté sans délai. Nous continuerons à suivre l’évolution de la situation.

Signé par

Index de la censure
ARTICLE 19
Article 21
Association des journalistes européens (AEJ)
Association des avocats pour la liberté (ÖHD)
Comité pour la protection des journalistes (CPJ)
Centre PEN de Croatie
PEN danois
Deutsche Journalistinnen und Journalisten Union (dju) in ver.di
Association des journalistes de Dicle Firat (DFG)
DİSK Basın-İş
PEN anglais
Centre européen pour la liberté de la presse et des médias (ECPMF)
Fédération européenne des journalistes (FEJ)
Le goût de l’eau 
Association Giuristi Democratici – Italie
Association des droits de l’homme (İHD)
IFEX
Fédération internationale des journalistes (FIJ)
Institut international de la presse (IPI)
Société internationale des droits de l’homme (SIDH)
Internationale Gesellschaft für Menschenrechte (IGFM)
Union des journalistes de Turquie (TGS)
PEN kurde
Association d’études sur les médias et le droit (MLSA)
P24 Plate-forme pour le journalisme indépendant 
PEN America
PEN Català
PEN Espéranto
PEN International 
PEN Melbourne
PEN Pays-Bas
PEN Norvège
PEN Suède
PEN Sydney
Association des juristes progressistes (ÇHD), Turquie
Centre de recherche et de développement pour la démocratie (CRED)
San Miguel PEN
Organisation des médias de l’Europe du Sud-Est (SEEMO)
Stimmen der Solidarität – Mahnwache Köln e.V.
Centre PEN des Vietnamiens de l’étranger
Wahrheitskämpfers e. V.

************************

Turquía: Condena de la orden de detención dictada contra el periodista y poeta Nedim Türfent

4 de julio de 2025 – PEN International se une a las organizaciones internacionales de defensa de la libertad de expresión, la libertad de los medios de comunicación, los derechos humanos y los periodistas para expresar su profunda preocupación por las informaciones según las cuales se ha dictado una orden de detención contra el escritor, periodista y poeta kurdo Nedim Türfent, acusado de “difundir propaganda a favor de
una organización terrorista”. Türfent vive actualmente exiliado en Alemania debido a la persecución que sufre por parte de las autoridades turcas. Aunque la orden de detención fue emitida el 7 de mayo de 2025 por la Fiscalía General del distrito de Yüksekova, en Hakkari, Türfent no tuvo conocimiento de ella hasta el 25 de junio. La existencia de la orden fue hecha pública por la Asociación de Periodistas Dicle Firat
(DFG) el 27 de junio.

Se trata de la última de una letanía de amenazas y acoso judicial 
dirigidas contra Türfent en los últimos años. Pasó seis años y siete meses en prisión tras ser detenido en mayo de 2016 en respuesta a su reportaje sobre los malos tratos infligidos por las fuerzas especiales de policía a trabajadores kurdos. Esto se produjo en medio de una severa represión del periodismo de interés público, en la que escritores y periodistas kurdos fueron blanco explícito. Según PEN Internacionalcomo consecuencia de sus reportajes “empezó a recibir amenazas de muerte de la policía y fue objeto de una campaña de acoso en Internet”. Al día siguiente de su detención, fue acusado formalmente de “pertenencia a organización terrorista”. De los 20 testigos citados durante las vistas judiciales, 19 se retractaron de sus declaraciones, alegando que habían sido obtenidas bajo tortura. Türfent pasó casi dos años en régimen de aislamiento. Tras pasar más de 2.400 días entre rejas, fue puesto en libertad el 29 de noviembre de 2022. 

Según informa DFG, la base de la orden parecen ser cuatro publicaciones 
y retweets relacionados con noticias que Türfent compartió en su cuenta X. El cargo de “difusión de propaganda a favor de una organización terrorista”, recogido en el artículo 7 de la Ley Antiterrorista de Turquía (Ley nº 3713), se utiliza desde hace tiempo para reprimir el discurso crítico o la información de interés público. En 2024 se bloquearon 82 cuentas en X, incluidas las de políticos, periodistas, editores y medios de comunicación kurdos. bloqueadas por los tribunales turcos basándose en esta acusación, así como en otras disposiciones utilizadas habitualmente para restringir la libertad de expresión. Otros periodistas y representantes de la sociedad civil, entre ellos Erol Önderoğlu (representante de Reporteros Sin Fronteras en Türkiye y miembro del Instituto Internacional de Prensa), Şebnem Korur Fincancı (presidente de la Fundación de Derechos Humanos de Türkiye) y el escritor Ahmet Nesin también han sido acusados en virtud de esta disposición en 2016. Aunque fueron absueltos, este veredicto fue anulado en octubre de 2020.

Como Türfent reside ahora en Alemania, la orden puede dar lugar a una 
solicitud de extradición. Türkiye lleva mucho tiempo solicitando la extradición de personas en el exilio, muchas de las cuales fueron perseguidas por sus críticas al partido gobernante y al presidente Recep Tayyip Erdoğan o por actos de periodismo de interés público. Por ejemplo, en 2017, un año después del golpe de Estado fallido, se informó que Türkiye había solicitado a Alemania la extradición de 81 personas. 

Aunque los tribunales alemanes han rechazado anteriormente varias 
solicitudes por motivos de derechos humanos y en referencia al Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, nos preocupa profundamente la posibilidad de que Türfent sea devuelto por la fuerza a Türkiye. Este temor se ve acrecentado por el hecho de que su visado expira a finales de agosto de 2025.

Nosotros, los abajo firmantes, condenamos la emisión de esta orden de 
detención contra Türfent por actos de expresión protegidos y por su trabajo como periodista. En declaraciones a Índice de Censura en 2023 sobre su persecución, Türfent dijo: “Mi labor periodística fue declarada entonces ‘delito'”. Esto no puede volver a ocurrir, y pedimos que se revoque la orden sin demora. Seguiremos vigilando la situación.

Firmado por

Índice de la Censura
ARTÍCULO 19
Artículo 21
Asociación de Periodistas Europeos (AEJ)
Asociación de Abogados por la Libertad (ÖHD)
Comité para la Protección de los Periodistas (CPJ)
Centro PEN Croata
PEN danés
Unión Alemana de Periodistas (dju) en ver.di
Asociación de Periodistas Dicle Firat (DFG)
DİSK Basın-İş
PEN inglés
Centro Europeo para la Libertad de Prensa y de los Medios de
Comunicación (ECPMF)
Federación Europea de Periodistas (FEP)
Le goût de l’eau 
Asociación Giuristi Democratici – Italia  
Asociación de Derechos Humanos (İHD)
IFEX
Federación Internacional de Periodistas (FIP)
Instituto Internacional de Prensa (IPI) 
Sociedad Internacional de Derechos Humanos (SIDH)
Sociedad Internacional de Derechos Humanos (IGFM)
Sindicato de Periodistas de Turquía (TGS)
PEN kurdo
Asociación de Estudios de Derecho y Medios de Comunicación (MLSA)
P24 Plataforma de Periodismo Independiente 
PEN América
PEN Català
PEN Espéranto
PEN Internacional 
PEN Melbourne
PEN Países Bajos
PEN Noruega
PEN Suecia
PEN Sydney
Asociación de Abogados Progresistas (ÇHD), Turquía
Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo para la Democracia (CRED)
PEN San Miguel
Organización de Medios de Comunicación de Europa Sudoriental (SEEMO)
Stimmen der Solidarität – Mahnwache Köln e.V.
Centro PEN de Vietnamitas en el Extranjero
Wahrheitskämpfers e. V.

************************

تركيا: صدور مذكرة توقيف بحق الصحفي والشاعر نديم ترفنت، وإدانة الصحفي والشاعر نديم ترفنت  

04 يوليو/تموز 2025 – تنضم منظمة القلم الدولية إلى المنظمات الدولية المعنية بحرية التعبير وحرية الإعلام وحقوق الإنسان والصحفيين في الإعراب عن قلقها العميق إزاء التقارير التي تفيد بصدور مذكرة اعتقال بحق الكاتب والصحفي والشاعر الكردي نديم ترفنت بتهمة “نشر دعاية لصالح منظمة إرهابية”. يعيش تورفنت حاليًا في المنفى في ألمانيا بسبب الاضطهاد المستمر الذي يتعرض له من قبل السلطات التركية. في حين أن مذكرة الاعتقال صدرت في 7 مايو 2025 من قبل مكتب المدعي العام في منطقة يوكسيكوفا في هكاري، لم يتم إعلام تورفنت بها إلا في 25 يونيو. وقد تم الإعلان عن وجود المذكرة من قبل جمعية الصحفيين في دجلة فرات (DFG) في 27 يونيو. 

وهذا هو الأحدث في سلسلة من التهديدات والمضايقات القضائية التي تستهدف تورفنت في السنوات الأخيرة. فقد أمضى ست سنوات وسبعة أشهر في السجن بعد اعتقاله في مايو 2016 رداً على تقاريره عن سوء معاملة قوات الشرطة الخاصة للعمال الأكراد. وجاء ذلك في خضم حملة شديدة على صحافة المصلحة العامة، حيث تم استهداف الكتاب والصحفيين الأكراد بشكل صريح. وبحسب منظمة القلم الدولية”بدأ يتلقى تهديدات بالقتل من الشرطة نتيجةً لتقاريره الصحفية، وكان هدفًا لحملة مضايقات على الإنترنت.” وفي اليوم التالي لاعتقاله، وجهت إليه رسمياً تهمة “الانتماء إلى منظمة إرهابية”. ومن بين الشهود العشرين الذين تم استدعاؤهم خلال جلسات المحكمة، تراجع 19 شاهدًا عن أقوالهم قائلين إنهم انتزعت منهم تحت التعذيب. قضى تورفنت ما يقرب من عامين في الحبس الانفرادي. وبعد أن أمضى أكثر من 2,400 يوم خلف القضبان، أُطلق سراحه في 29 نوفمبر 2022.  

وكما ذكرت وكالة الأنباء الألمانية (DFG)، يبدو أن أساس المذكرة هو أربع منشورات متعلقة بالأخبار وإعادة التغريدات التي نشرها تورفنت على حسابه على موقع X. لطالما استُخدمت تهمة “نشر دعاية لصالح منظمة إرهابية”، المنصوص عليها في المادة 7 من قانون مكافحة الإرهاب في تركيا (القانون رقم 3713)، لخنق الخطاب النقدي أو التقارير التي تهم المصلحة العامة. في عام 2024، تم حظر 82 حسابًا على موقع X، بما في ذلك الحسابات التي يستخدمها سياسيون وصحفيون وناشرون ودور إعلام كردية تم حظرها من قبل المحاكم التركية على أساس هذه التهمة، بالإضافة إلى أحكام أخرى تُستخدم عادةً لتقييد حرية التعبير. كما تم حظر حسابات صحفيين وممثلين عن المجتمع المدنيومن بينهم إيرول أونديروغلو (ممثل منظمة مراسلون بلا حدود في تركيا وعضو المعهد الدولي للصحافة)، وشبنم كورور فنجانجي (رئيس مؤسسة حقوق الإنسان في تركيا) والكاتب أحمد نسين تم اتهامهم بموجب هذا الحكم في عام 2016. وفي حين تمت تبرئتهما، إلا أن هذا الحكم ألغي هذا الحكم في أكتوبر 2020.  

وبما أن تورفنت مقيم الآن في ألمانيا، فقد تؤدي مذكرة التوقيف إلى طلب تسليمه. ولطالما طلبت تركيا تسليم الأشخاص الموجودين في المنفى، حيث تم استهداف العديد منهم بسبب انتقادهم للحزب الحاكم والرئيس رجب طيب أردوغان أو بسبب أعمالهم الصحفية ذات المصلحة العامة. على سبيل المثال، في عام 2017، أي بعد عام من الانقلاب الفاشل، تم الإبلاغ عن تقارير أن تركيا طلبت تسليم 81 شخصًا من ألمانيا. وفي حين أن المحاكم الألمانية رفضت في السابق عددًا من الطلبات لأسباب تتعلق بحقوق الإنسان وبالرجوع إلى المحكمة الأوروبية لحقوق الإنسان، إلا أننا نشعر بقلق عميق من إمكانية إعادة تورفنت قسراً إلى تركيا. ومما يعزز هذا الخوف أن تأشيرته تنتهي صلاحيتها في نهاية أغسطس/آب 2025. 

نحن الموقعين أدناه، ندين إصدار مذكرة الاعتقال هذه التي تستهدف تورفنت بسبب أفعاله التي تحميها القوانين الدولية وعمله كصحفي. وفي حديثنا إلى لمؤشر الرقابة في عام 2023 حول اضطهاده، قال تورفنت “أُعلن بعد ذلك أن عملي الصحفي “جريمة”. هذا لا يمكن أن يحدث مرة أخرى، ونحن ندعو إلى سحب مذكرة الاعتقال دون تأخير. سنواصل مراقبة الوضع.  

توقيع 

 توقيع 

 فهرس الرقابة 

المادة 19 

أرتيكولو 21 

رابطة الصحفيين الأوروبيين (AEJ) 

رابطة المحامين من أجل الحرية (ÖHD) 

لجنة حماية الصحفيين 

مركز القلم الكرواتي 

القلم الدنماركي 

اتحاد الصحفيين والصحفيين الألمان (dju) في فيريدي 

جمعية صحفيي دجلة فرات دجلة (DFG) 

DİSK Basın-İş 

القلم الإنجليزي 

المركز الأوروبي لحرية الصحافة والإعلام (ECPMF) 

الاتحاد الأوروبي للصحفيين (EFJ) 

نقيع الجيفانجين  

جمعية جيورستي ديمقراطي – إيطاليا   

جمعية حقوق الإنسان (İHD) 

آيفكس 

الاتحاد الدولي للصحفيين (IFJ) 

المعهد الدولي للصحافة  

الجمعية الدولية لحقوق الإنسان (ISHR) 

المنظمة الدولية لحقوق الإنسان (IGFM) 

اتحاد الصحفيين في تركيا (TGS) 

القلم الكردي 

جمعية دراسات الإعلام والقانون (MLSA) 

منصة P24 للصحافة المستقلة  

بن أمريكا 

PEN Català  

بن الاسبرانتو 

منظمة القلم الدولية  

بين ملبورن 

PEN هولندا 

نادي القلم النرويجي 

القلم السويد 

قلم سيدني 

جمعية المحامين التقدميين (ÇHD)، تركيا 

مركز البحث والتطوير من أجل الديمقراطية (CRED) 

سان ميغيل سان ميغيل بن 

منظمة جنوب شرق أوروبا الإعلامية (SEEMO) 

Stimmen der Solidarität – Mahnwache Köln e.V. 

مركز القلم الفيتناميون في الخارج 

Wahrheitskämpfers e. V. 

2 July 2025: Journalists detained under the Artvin investigation must be released immediately!

July 2, 2025 disabled comments

Journalists Dicle Baştürk, Yavuz Akengin, Eylem Emel Yılmaz, and Sendika.Org contributor Ozan Cırık, who were detained during house raids in Istanbul on 13 June, were put under arrest pending trial by the on-duty court on the night of 16 June on charges of “membership of a terrorist organization.” Moreover, as part of the same investigation, journalist Metin Yoksu was also arrested on 26 June after voluntarily
appearing before the prosecutor in Batman to give his testimony.
The investigation file cites the journalists’ provision of technical services to news websites, the copyright fees they received for their reporting, and their professional communications as grounds for prosecution. These journalists are being punished simply for doing their jobs and for receiving payment for their work. Under national and international regulations that safeguard press freedom, it is unacceptable to criminalize journalistic activity.
Producing news, sharing news, and receiving payment for such work is not a crime. Journalism is not a crime. As press freedom organizations and civil society groups signing below, we consider these arrests yet another example of how vague criminal
charges are increasingly misused to silence the press. It is unacceptable to accuse journalists of “membership in a terrorist organization” solely for producing and publishing news.
At a time when journalism is already under siege from job insecurity, pressure, and censorship—when journalists are targeted with detention based on the outlets they work with, the organizations they are affiliated with, or their official employment records—these arrests are a direct assault on the public’s right to information.
We demand the immediate release of the detained journalists and call on the authorities to put an end to attempts to silence the press.

Signatories:
Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA)
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
Media Communication and Postal Employees Union (HABER-SEN)
Trade Union of Journalists, Publishing House and Printing House Workers
(DİSK Basın-İş)
P24 Platform for Independent Journalism
Netgazeti, Georgia
Batumelebi, Georgia
The Georgian Charter of Journalistic Ethics
Independent Association of Georgian Journalists (IAGJ)
Journalism Resource Center (JRC)
Community Radio “Marneuli”
Journalists’ Union of Turkey (TGS)
International Federation of Journalists (IFJ)
Journalists and Media Workers Union (Russia)
International Press Institute (IPI)
ARTICLE 19
South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)

Artvin soruşturmasında tutuklu gazeteciler derhal serbest bırakılmalıdır!

13 Haziran’da İstanbul’da yapılan ev baskınlarında gözaltına alınan gazeteciler Dicle Baştürk, Yavuz Akengin, Eylem Emel Yılmaz ve Sendika.Org emekçisi Ozan Cırık, 16 Haziran gecesi çıkarıldıkları nöbetçi mahkeme tarafından ‘örgüt üyeliği’ iddiasıyla tutuklandı. Aynı soruşturma kapsamında ayrıca gazeteci Metin Yoksu Batman’da savcılığa giderek ifade verdikten sonra 26 Haziran’da tutuklandı.
Soruşturma dosyasında gazetecilerin haber sitelerine sağladıkları teknik hizmetler, haberleri için aldıkları telif ödemeleri ve mesleki iletişimleri suçlama konusu yapıldı. Gazeteciler, yaptıkları haberler ve bu haberler karşılığında aldıkları ödemeler nedeniyle cezalandırılmak isteniyor.
Basın özgürlüğünü koruyan ulusal ve uluslararası düzenlemeler kapsamında gazetecilik faaliyetlerinin suç unsuru olarak gösterilmesi kabul edilemez. Haber yapmak, haber paylaşmak ve bunun karşılığında telif ücreti almak suç değildir. Gazetecilik suç değildir.
Ayrıca gazeteci Eylem Yılmaz’ın cezaevi kapasite doluluğu gerekçesiyle yerde yattığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Haksız yere yargılanmasının yanı sıra psikolojik ve fiziksel sağlık sorunlarına yol açacak şekilde cezalandırılmaktadır. Bu koşullar uluslararası insan hakları sözleşmelerine de aykırıdır.
Aşağıda imzası bulunan basın meslek örgütleri ve sivil toplum kuruluşları olarak, bu tutuklamaların, muğlak suçlamaların basını susturmak amacıyla giderek nasıl daha fazla istismar edilmesinin en son örneği olduğunu düşünüyoruz. Gazetecilerin yalnızca haber üretiminden ve paylaşımından dolayı ‘örgüt üyeliği’ ile suçlanması kabul edilemez.
Gazeteciliğin ifade özgürlüğü başta olmak üzere güvencesizlik, baskı ve sansürle kuşatıldığı bu günlerde gazetecilerin gelir elde ettikleri mecralar, çalıştıkları kurumlar ve SGK kayıtları temelinde tutuklama uygulamasıyla baskı altına alınmaya, sindirilmeye çalışılması halkın haber alma hakkının da engellenmesidir.
Tutuklu gazetecilerin derhal serbest bırakılmasını ve basını susturmaya yönelik girişimlerden vazgeçilmesini talep ediyoruz.

İmzacılar:
Medya ve Hukuk Çalışmaları Derneği (MLSA)
Avrupa Basın ve Medya Özgürlüğü Merkezi (ECPMF)
Haber-Sen (Basın Yayın İletişim ve Posta Emekçileri Sendikası)
DİSK Basın-İş
Türkiye Gazeteciler Sendikası (TGS)
P24 Bağımsız Gazetecilik Derneği
Netgazeti, Gürcistan
Batumelebi, Gürcistan
Community Radio “Marneuli”, Gürcistan
Gürcistan Gazetecilik Etik Tüzüğü
Gürcistan Bağımsız Gazeteciler Derneği (IAGJ)
Gazetecilik Kaynak Merkezi (JRC)
Uluslararası Basın Enstitüsü (IPI)
ARTICLE 19
Avrupa Gazeteciler Federasyonu (EFJ)
Uluslararası Gazeteciler Federasyonu (IFJ)
Gazeteciler ve Medya Çalışanları Sendikası (Rusya)
Güney Doğu Avrupa Medya Örgütü (SEEMO)